System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Recreation demand and pricing policy for international tourists in developing countries: evidence from South Africa
Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. Public and Environmental Economics Research Centre, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences. Environmental Policy Research Unit, School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3400-7548
The World Bank Group, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
2021 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, ISSN 2160-6544, E-ISSN 2160-6552, Vol. 10, no 3, p. 243-260Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

National park agencies in Africa often lack incentives to maximize revenue, despite the decline in conservation subsidies from the State. We explore the potential of pricing policy to generate funds for extensive conservation. We estimate recreation demand by international tourists for a popular South African park, calculate the consumer surplus and find the revenue-maximizing entrance fee. Our results suggest substantial underpricing and therefore significant forgone income. By charging low fees at popular parks despite increasing conservation mandates and declining conservation subsidies, national parks in developing countries are forgoing substantial revenue crucial for combating widespread biodiversity losses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2021. Vol. 10, no 3, p. 243-260
Keywords [en]
Entrance fee, benefit sharing, non-market valuation, optimal pricing, recreation demand
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-82202DOI: 10.1080/21606544.2020.1853609ISI: 000597869300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85106067559OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-82202DiVA, id: diva2:1515096
Funder
Sida - Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
Note

Validerad;2021;Nivå 2;2021-09-01 (johcin);

Finansiär: Economic Research Southern Africa (ERSA)

Available from: 2021-01-08 Created: 2021-01-08 Last updated: 2021-08-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Muchapondwa, Edwin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Muchapondwa, Edwin
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 97 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf