Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Diaphragm shear and diagonal compression testing of cross-laminated timber
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0900-5110
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0687-9154
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4686-4010
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Wood Science and Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0145-080x
2021 (English)In: SN Applied Sciences, ISSN 2523-3963, E-ISSN 2523-3971, Vol. 3, article id 842Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To learn the characteristics of a cross-laminated timber (CLT) panel, it is crucial to perform experimental tests. This study presents two experimental test methods to measure the in-plane shear modulus of CLT panels. This characteristic can be measured by multiple methods such as the picture frame test, the diagonal compression test, and the diaphragm shear test. In this study, the same CLT panels are tested and evaluated in the diaphragm shear test and the diagonal compression test to see if more reliable results can be achieved from the diaphragm shear test. This evaluation is done by experimental tests and finite element simulations. The theoretical pure shear simulation is used as a reference case. Finite element simulations are made for both edge glued and non-edge glued CLT panels. Nine CLT panels are tested in the diaphragm shear test and the diagonal compression test. During ideal conditions (uniform material properties and contact conditions), all three simulated methods result in an almost equal shear modulus. During the experimental testing, the diagonal compression test gives more coherent results with the expected shear modulus based on finite element simulations. Based on the diaphragm shear test results, the CLT panels behave like edge glued, but this situation is dismissed. However, during ideal conditions, the diaphragm shear test is seen as a more reliable method due to the higher proportion of shear in the measured area.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2021. Vol. 3, article id 842
Keywords [en]
Cross-laminated timber, CLT, Diagonal compression test, Diaphragm shear test, In-plane shear modulus
National Category
Building Technologies
Research subject
Wood Science and Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-83596DOI: 10.1007/s42452-021-04826-8ISI: 000706735000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85117310044OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-83596DiVA, id: diva2:1543529
Note

Validerad;2021;Nivå 2;2021-10-25 (johcin)

Available from: 2021-04-12 Created: 2021-04-12 Last updated: 2023-03-28Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. In-Plane Shear Modulus of Cross-Laminated Timber
Open this publication in new window or tab >>In-Plane Shear Modulus of Cross-Laminated Timber
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Cross-laminated timber (CLT) is a building component used in walls, floors, roofs, or beams in a building. The advantages of using CLT as a building component are, among others, its high load-carrying capability and the possibility of pre-fabrication. The in-plane shear properties of a CLT panel are the in-plane shear modulus and in-plane shear load carrying capacity. This thesis is solely about the in-plane shear modulus and is intended to increase the understanding about the in-plane shear modulus of CLT panels. The in-plane shear modulus is important and there is a need to better understand and estimate its value. The objective of this work was to contribute to the need of finding a suitable test method to measure the in-plane shear modulus of CLT panels and to find factors affecting the in-plane shear modulus.  Three different methods: the picture frame test, the diagonal compression test and the diaphragm shear test, were used in practice and compared to a theoretical test method, the pure shear test. The three methods were compared by conducting experimental tests and by simulating the methods using finite element (FE). Based on the FE simulations, an equation to calculate the shear modulus was created for each test method.  Results from the FE analyses showed that the picture frame test gave results similar to the theoretical pure shear test models. The reason for this result was that the picture frame test is a biaxial testing method. The diagonal compression test and the diaphragm shear test are uniaxial test method. It was also concluded that the picture frame test has a pure shear state in the measured region. The mean error for the in-plane shear modulus equations was estimated, by comparing results from practical testing and FE simulations, to be -2.5%, +12.6% and +11.8% for the picture frame test, diagonal compression test and diaphragm shear test, respectively. The diagonal compression test was the preferred method to use with respect to its simplicity.The factors having an impact on the in-plane shear modulus were found by comparing multiple FE simulations. The results showed that it is possible to increase the in-plane shear modulus by: increasing the odd numbered layers width-to-thickness ratio; decreasing the odd layers thickness ratio of the CLT panels thickness; increasing the number of layers; reducing the gaps between boards; and using alternative main laminate directions. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2021
Series
Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → …, ISSN 1402-1544
National Category
Other Civil Engineering Building Technologies
Research subject
Wood Science and Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-83652 (URN)978-91-7790-823-4 (ISBN)978-91-7790-824-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-06-09, Auditorium A, Skellefteå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-04-15 Created: 2021-04-14 Last updated: 2021-05-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sharifi, JonasSharifi, ZahraBerg, SvenEkevad, Mats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sharifi, JonasSharifi, ZahraBerg, SvenEkevad, Mats
By organisation
Wood Science and Engineering
In the same journal
SN Applied Sciences
Building Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 172 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf