Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 24/9-2024, at 12:00-14:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Challenges in Measuring Performance of Collaborative R&D Projects
Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden. Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Managing Collaborative R&D Projects / [ed] Gabriela Fernandes, Lawrence Dooley, David O'Sullivan, Asbjørn Rolstadås, Springer, 2021, p. 317-329Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

While measuring the performance of collaborative research and development (R&D) projects is critical for both practitioners and academics, it is rarely straightforward in practice. Based on first-hand experience of the performance measurement practice within an extensive, long-term, Swedish innovation programme named Smart Built Environment, this chapter provides a reflective account of the setup and challenges experienced. The programme was launched in 2016 and is a long-term initiative of up to 12 years. Backed by three state research agencies, it is, to date, the single largest investment in innovation, R&D in digitalisation made in the Swedish built environment sector. This chapter is written as a collaborative autoethnography, with three out of the five authors having had first-hand experience of the specific measurement initiative analysed. The chapter describes how the visionary objectives of the programme, related to sustainability, time, cost, and business logics, were developed and operationalised in practice. Furthermore, it is explained how several emergent challenges related to ambiguity in goal formulation, adaptation to contingencies of moving targets and temporal scope, and development of a multiplicity of assessment methods, were managed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2021. p. 317-329
Series
Contributions to Management Science, ISSN 1431-1941, E-ISSN 2197-716X
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
Construction Management and Building Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-83808DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-61605-2_18Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85103576836OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-83808DiVA, id: diva2:1545367
Note

ISBN för värdpublikation: 978-3-030-61604-5, 978-3-030-61605-2

Available from: 2021-04-19 Created: 2021-04-19 Last updated: 2023-07-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Samuelson, Olle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Samuelson, Olle
By organisation
Industrilized and sustainable construction
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 174 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf