Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Understanding the drivers of subsistence poaching in the great limpopo transfrontier conservation area: What matters for community wildlife conservation?
School of Economics, University of Cape Town, South Africa; WWF South Africa.
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Social Sciences. School of Economics, University of Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3400-7548
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Ecology and Society, E-ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 26, no 1, article id 18Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Although subsistence poaching is a large threat to wildlife conservation in Southern Africa, this behavior is seldom researched. Our understanding of individual and community level factors that drive such behavior is limited because of both lack of data and the literature’s predominant focus on commercial poaching. The main objective of this study is to contribute to this scanty literature by examining the factors that are correlated to subsistence poaching in the Great Limpopo, a transfrontier reserve spanning across Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. We use collected primary data from a sample of 2282 respondents and 85 villages that are part of the transfrontier conservation area. We focus on two features, reported subsistence poaching incidences in the community and the previous hunting of individuals, a behavior that is now forbidden in this area. We find through multivariate regression analysis that the likelihood for reported poaching incidences was higher in communities with a larger proportion of young men, plenty of wildlife, and experiencing wildlife conflict. In addition, our survey results illustrate that there is less poaching in communities where local people trust each other, respect institutions, perceive that the management of the park is good, and view wildlife as an asset. Some of these variables can be influenced by appropriate interventions; our findings suggest that capacity building in local institutions, use of community-based crime prevention approaches, training related to wildlife management, and public awareness campaigns could be used by policy makers to affect individuals’ perceptions and behaviors in this context.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Resilience Alliance , 2021. Vol. 26, no 1, article id 18
Keywords [en]
common pool resources, community institutions, Mozambique, South Africa, subsistence poaching, wildlife conservation, Zimbabwe
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-84290DOI: 10.5751/ES-12201-260118ISI: 000638266300023Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85104589946OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-84290DiVA, id: diva2:1555433
Note

Validerad;2021;Nivå 2;2021-05-18 (johcin)

Available from: 2021-05-18 Created: 2021-05-18 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Muchapondwa, EdwinJagers, Sverker C.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Muchapondwa, EdwinJagers, Sverker C.
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
Ecology and Society
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 91 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf