Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Past, present, and future of green product innovation
Department of Management Studies, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India.
Department of Management, School of Business & Law, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway; Faculty of Social Sciences, The Norwegian School of Hotel Management, Stavanger, Norway; Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Business Administration and Industrial Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3255-414X
Faculty of Communication Science, University of Teramo, Teramo, Italy; HSE University, Moscow, Russian Federation.
2021 (English)In: Business Strategy and the Environment, ISSN 0964-4733, E-ISSN 1099-0836, Vol. 30, no 8, p. 4081-4106Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Firms are under constant pressure from various governmental and nongovernmental agencies to switch from conventional environmentally polluting products to green product innovations (GPIs). However, the relevant research pertaining to GPI has been published in a diverse set of journals that vary in their scope and readership and, therefore, the scholarly contribution to the topic remains largely fragmented. This study has utilised a systematic literature review approach to examine the literary corpus on GPI to paint a holistic picture of its different aspects. The content and thematic analysis of 85 studies resulted in the extraction of seven key research themes: organisational capabilities, organisational learning, institutional pressures, barriers, structural changes, benefits of GPI, and methodological choices. This study's findings further highlight the various gaps in the GPI literature and raise some research questions that warrant scholarly investigation in the future. Likewise, our study has important implications for practitioners who are likely to benefit from a holistic understanding of the different aspects of GPI. Similarly, policymakers can use this study's findings to introduce policy interventions, especially in countries where GPI adoption is low.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2021. Vol. 30, no 8, p. 4081-4106
Keywords [en]
green product innovation (GPI), institutional pressures, organisational learning, structural changes, systematic literature review
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-86464DOI: 10.1002/bse.2858ISI: 000671526400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85109418102OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-86464DiVA, id: diva2:1581899
Note

Validerad;2022;Nivå 2;2022-02-25 (joosat);

Funder: HSE University

Available from: 2021-07-27 Created: 2021-07-27 Last updated: 2022-03-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Parida, Vinit

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Parida, Vinit
By organisation
Business Administration and Industrial Engineering
In the same journal
Business Strategy and the Environment
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 93 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf