Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health, Learning and Technology, Nursing and Medical Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9549-2663
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health, Learning and Technology, Nursing and Medical Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6244-6401
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health, Learning and Technology, Nursing and Medical Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8842-7759
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health, Learning and Technology, Nursing and Medical Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8990-752X
2021 (English)In: Nursing Open, E-ISSN 2054-1058, Vol. 8, no 5, p. 2452-2460Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim

The aim of this study is to develop and psychometrically test the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale.

Design

The study design was non-experimental and cross-sectional.

Method

The evaluation followed classical test theory, and the instrument was evaluated regarding reliability, construct validity and content validity. For the reliability analysis, a postal questionnaire consisting of the 16 items of the scale was dispatched in March 2020 to a consecutive sample (N = 242) of patients who had undergone hip or knee replacement arthroplasties with regional anaesthesia. Five experts in nursing care evaluated the content validity of the scale.

Result

Internal consistency was 0.841. Three items were excluded due to deficits in reliability, resulting in a 13-item scale. A principal component analysis revealed a two-dimensional solution, labelled internal and external aspects of feeling safe. Two items were rephrased to improve clarity and content validity. The average content validity for the scale was 0.88, indicating acceptable content validity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2021. Vol. 8, no 5, p. 2452-2460
Keywords [en]
dimensions of safety, feeling safe, instrument development, nursing, patient safety, perioperative period, psychometric evaluation, regional anaesthesia, safety, surgery
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-86473DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1003ISI: 000675441600001PubMedID: 34291891Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85110937266OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-86473DiVA, id: diva2:1581977
Note

Validerad;2021;Nivå 2;2021-08-17 (johcin)

Available from: 2021-07-27 Created: 2021-07-27 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Larsson, FannyEngström, ÅsaStrömbäck, UlricaGustafsson, Silje

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Larsson, FannyEngström, ÅsaStrömbäck, UlricaGustafsson, Silje
By organisation
Nursing and Medical Technology
In the same journal
Nursing Open
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 172 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf