Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Interference suppression in bilingualism: Stimulus-Stimulus vs. Stimulus-Response conflict
School of Foreign Languages, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh.
School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh.
School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Humans and Technology. School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences, The University of Edinburgh.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2511-1631
2022 (English)In: Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, ISSN 1366-7289, E-ISSN 1469-1841, Vol. 25, no 2, p. 256-268Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Studies examining the potential effects of bilingualism on interference suppression show inconsistent results. Our study approaches this topic by distinguishing two potential subcomponents within interference suppression (i.e., Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response conflict). We investigated the two subcomponents through their operationalisation in different tasks and examined the role of language proficiency in modulating it. A sample of 111 young adult participants performed four non-linguistic cognitive tasks measuring both visual and auditory domains of cognitive control. Bilinguals outperformed monolinguals in tasks involving Stimulus-Stimulus conflict, but showed comparable performance in tasks involving Stimulus-Response conflict. Specific effects of language proficiency on cognitive control were observed: group differences in auditory inhibition and visual orienting were only observed between high-proficient bilinguals and monolinguals. Taken together, types of conflicts involved in interference tasks and language proficiency could differentially affect performance in monolinguals and bilinguals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press, 2022. Vol. 25, no 2, p. 256-268
Keywords [en]
bilingualism, interference suppression, Stimulus-Stimulus inhibition, Stimulus-Response inhibition, language proficiency
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Research subject
Engineering Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-87031DOI: 10.1017/S1366728921000304ISI: 000743777600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85114379622OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-87031DiVA, id: diva2:1592913
Note

Validerad;2022;Nivå 2;2022-04-13 (sofila);

Funder: School of Philosophy, Psychology & Language Sciences (PPLS) Research Support Grants, the University of Edinburgh

Available from: 2021-09-10 Created: 2021-09-10 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Vega-Mendoza, Mariana

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vega-Mendoza, Mariana
By organisation
Humans and Technology
In the same journal
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 128 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf