Electronic cigarette use and smoking cessation in cohort studies and randomized trials: A systematic review and meta-analysisShow others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Tobacco Prevention & Cessation, ISSN 2459-3087, Vol. 7, no 62, article id 142320Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Introduction: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the association between e-cigarette use and subsequent smoking cessation in cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT).
Methods: A systematic literature search was finalized 11 November 2019 using EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, PubMed Health, NICE evidence search, PROSPERO, CRD, PsycInfo, and PubMed including Medline. Inclusion criteria were: reporting empirical results; longitudinal observational design with a minimum of 3 months of follow-up; including general population samples; and allowing for comparison between users and non-users of e-cigarettes. Studies rated as having high risk of bias were excluded. The procedures described by PRISMA were followed, and the quality of evidence was rated using GRADE.
Results: Twenty-eight longitudinal, peer-reviewed publications from 26 cohort studies, and eight publications from seven RCTs assessing the association between e-cigarette use and smoking cessation were included in this review. A randomeffects meta-analysis based on 39147 participants in cohort studies showed a pooled unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for smoking cessation among baseline e-cigarette users compared with baseline non-users of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.67–1.40), while the adjusted OR was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.63–1.27). The pooled odds ratio for smoking cessation in RCTs was 1.78 (95% CI: 1.41–2.25). The evidence for cohort studies was graded as very low and for RCTs as low.
Conclusions: We did not find quality evidence for an association between e-cigarette use and smoking cessation. Although RCTs tended to support a more positive association between e-cigarette use and smoking cessation than the cohort studies, the grading of evidence was consistently low.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention , 2021. Vol. 7, no 62, article id 142320
Keywords [en]
electronic cigarettes, smoking cessation, quit smoking, systematic review, cohort, randomized, controlled trial
National Category
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy
Research subject
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-87646DOI: 10.18332/tpc/142320ISI: 000707570300001PubMedID: 34712864Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85120179239OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-87646DiVA, id: diva2:1605886
Funder
Public Health Agency of Sweden Norrbotten County Council, NLL-933163Swedish Research Council, 2018-0258
Note
Validerad;2021;Nivå 2;2021-10-26 (beamah);
Forskningsfinansiär: The Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU); The Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation (20200765, 20200750, 20170696, 20170438); a regional agreement between Umeå University and Västerbotten County Council (RV-738451)
2021-10-262021-10-262021-12-13Bibliographically approved