Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Swedish version of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire: A clinimetric study of validity and reliability
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Health and Rehabilitation.
Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
2023 (English)In: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, ISSN 0959-3985, E-ISSN 1532-5040, Vol. 39, no 1, p. 154-162Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: The Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) suggested to measure clinical instability of the spine.

Objective: The aim was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the LSIQ into Swedish and to test its measurement properties.

Methods: We included people with low back pain (LBP) seeking primary care (n = 101). The LSIQ was translated using international recommendations. Construct validity was investigated via the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RM) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Reliability was tested via test-retest (Intra Class Correlation, ICC2.1) (n = 50) and by analyzing internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha). A suggested cutoff score was used to study discriminative ability.

Results: The LSIQ was successfully translated into Swedish. For construct validity, a moderate correlation was shown with the RM (rho 0.58) and the NPRS (rho 0.47). Test-retest demonstrated high reliability for the total score (ICC2.1 0.94, 95% CI 0.86–0.96). Internal consistency reached a Cronbach Alpha of 0.64. Participants scoring higher on the LSIQ (≥9) showed significantly higher pain and lower disability levels, were of higher age and less physically active.

Conclusion: The Swedish LSIQ shows acceptable measurement properties regarding test-retest reliability and validity. To further study the usefulness of the LSIQ and the suggested cutoff score, the dimensionality needs to be investigated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2023. Vol. 39, no 1, p. 154-162
Keywords [en]
Clinical practice, patient reported outcome measure, low back pain, rehabilitation, stratification
National Category
Other Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-87899DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1999353ISI: 000713851700001PubMedID: 34724863Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85118451857OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-87899DiVA, id: diva2:1611423
Note

Godkänd;2023;Nivå 0;2023-02-10 (joosat)

Available from: 2021-11-15 Created: 2021-11-15 Last updated: 2023-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Krantz, Rasmus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Krantz, Rasmus
By organisation
Health and Rehabilitation
In the same journal
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Other Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf