Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Comparison of Gaussian Process and M5P for Prediction of Soil Permeability Coefficient
University of Transport Technology, Ha Noi 100000, Vietnam.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9707-840X
University of Transport Technology, Ha Noi 100000, Vietnam.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8038-2381
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Mining and Geotechnical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6790-2653
University of Transport Technology, Ha Noi 100000, Vietnam; Civil and Environmental Engineering Program, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6012-6460
2021 (English)In: Scientific Programming, ISSN 1058-9244, E-ISSN 1875-919X, Vol. 2021, article id 3625289Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The permeability coefficient (k) of soil is one of the most important parameters affecting soil characteristics such as shear strength or settlement. Thus, determining soil permeability coefficient is very crucial; however, a field test for determining this parameter is difficult, time-consuming, and expensive. In this study, soft computing methods, namely, M5P and Gaussian process (GP), for estimating the permeability coefficient were constructed and compared. The results of this paper indicate that the two soft computing algorithms functioned well in predicting k. These two methods gave high accuracy of prediction capability. The determination coefficient of M5P (R2 = 0.766) was higher than that (R2 = 0.700) of GP. This implies that the M5P model is more reliable estimation than the GP model in predicting soils’ permeability coefficient (k). This proves that applying these machine learning techniques can provide an alternative for predicting basic soil parameters, including the permeability coefficient of soil.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2021. Vol. 2021, article id 3625289
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering
Research subject
Soil Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-88013DOI: 10.1155/2021/3625289ISI: 000729175200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85119013184OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-88013DiVA, id: diva2:1614309
Note

Validerad;2021;Nivå 2;2021-12-03 (johcin)

Available from: 2021-11-25 Created: 2021-11-25 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Al-Ansari, Nadhir

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pham, Binh ThaiLy, Hai-BangAl-Ansari, NadhirHo, Lanh Si
By organisation
Mining and Geotechnical Engineering
In the same journal
Scientific Programming
Geotechnical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 58 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf