Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quality of institution and the FEG (forest, energy intensity, and globalization) -environment relationships in sub-Saharan Africa
Department of Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3581-4704
Department of Banking and Finance, University of Professional Studies, Accra, Ghana.
2017 (English)In: Environmental Science and Pollution Research, ISSN 0944-1344, E-ISSN 1614-7499, Vol. 24, no 21, p. 17455-17473Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The current share of sub-Saharan Africa in global carbon dioxide emissions is negligible compared to major contributors like Asia, Americas, and Europe. This trend is, however, likely to change given that both economic growth and rate of urbanization in the region are projected to be robust in the future. The current study contributes to the literature by examining both the direct and the indirect impacts of quality of institution on the environment. Specifically, we investigate whether the institutional setting in the region provides some sort of a complementary role in the environment-FEG relationships. We use the panel two-step system generalized method of moments (GMM) technique to deal with the simultaneity problem. Data consists of 43 sub-Saharan African countries. The result shows that energy inefficiency compromises environmental standards. However, the quality of the institutional setting helps moderate this negative consequences; countries with good institutions show greater prospects than countries with poor institutions. On the other hand, globalization of the region and increased forest size generate positive environmental outcomes in the region. Their impacts are, however, independent of the quality of institution. Afforestation programs, promotion of other clean energy types, and investment in energy efficiency, basic city infrastructure, and regulatory and institutional structures, are desirable policies to pursue to safeguard the environment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2017. Vol. 24, no 21, p. 17455-17473
National Category
Economics Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-88381DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-9300-2ISI: 000406479200015PubMedID: 28593542Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85020315084Libris ID: 10695444OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-88381DiVA, id: diva2:1619645
Available from: 2021-12-13 Created: 2021-12-13 Last updated: 2022-04-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin
In the same journal
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
EconomicsEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 7 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf