Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Auditory distraction can be studied online! A direct comparison between in-Person and online experimentation
Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2405-990X
Department of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0592-0362
Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’Éducation, Developmental Cognitive Psychology, Université de Genève, Genève, Switzerland; Faculty of Psychology, UniDistance Suisse, Brig, Switzerland.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7462-0446
Nick Robinson Computing Limited, Wilpshire, Blackburn, Lancashire, UK.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Cognitive Psychology, ISSN 2044-5911, E-ISSN 2044-592X, Vol. 34, no 3, p. 307-324Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Referring to the well-replicated finding that the presence of to-be-ignored sound disrupts short-term memory for serially-presented visual items, the irrelevant sound effect (ISE) is an important benchmark finding within cognitive psychology. The ISE has proven useful in evaluating the structure, function and development of short-term memory. This preregistered report focused on a methodological examination of the paradigm typically used to study the ISE and sought to determine whether the ISE can be reliably studied using the increasingly popular method of online testing. Comparing Psychology students tested online, in-person and participants from an online panel, results demonstrated successful reproduction of the key signature effects of auditory distraction (the changing-state effect and the steady-state effect), albeit smaller effects with the online panel. Our results confirmed the viability of online data collection for auditory distraction research and provided important insights for the accumulation and maintenance of high data quality in internet-based experimentation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2022. Vol. 34, no 3, p. 307-324
Keywords [en]
Auditory distraction, serial recall, online experiments
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Research subject
Engineering Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-90509DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2021.2021924ISI: 000787590200001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85128822996OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-90509DiVA, id: diva2:1655955
Note

Validerad;2022;Nivå 2;2022-05-04 (joosat);

Available from: 2022-05-04 Created: 2022-05-04 Last updated: 2022-08-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Marsh, John Everett

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Elliott, Emily M.Bell, RaoulGorin, SimonMarsh, John Everett
By organisation
Humans and Technology
In the same journal
Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 87 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf