Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Acoustic, and Categorical, Deviation Effects are Produced by Different Mechanisms: Evidence from Additivity and Habituation
School of Psychology and Computer Science, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
School of Psychology, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5282-6048
School of Psychology and Computer Science, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Nick Robinson Computing Limited, UK.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Auditory Perception & Cognition, E-ISSN 2574-2450, Vol. 5, no 1-2, p. 1-24Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Sounds that deviate, acoustically or semantically, from prevailing auditory backgrounds disrupt ongoing mental activity. An acoustic deviant is held to capture attention, but doubt has been cast on the attentional nature of the semantic, categorical deviation effect. Unlike the acoustical deviation effect, which is typically amenable to top-down cognitive control, the categorical deviation effect is impervious to top-down influences.To shed further light on the mechanisms underpinning acoustic and categorical deviance, we compared the disruptive impact produced by acoustic deviants (change of voice), categorical deviants (change of category) and combined deviants (change of voice and category) randomly inserted into a to-be-ignored sequence while participants performed a visual-verbal serial recall task.In Experiment 1, all deviants disrupted recall, however combined deviants produced greater disruption than acoustic deviants alone. In Experiment 2 only the disruption produced by an acoustic deviant diminished over the course of the experiment. The acoustic and categorical deviation effects combined additively to disrupt performance (Experiment 1) and habituation was only observed for the acoustic deviation effect (Experiment 2).These results gel with the idea that attentional responses to deviants, and habituation thereof (Experiment 2), is a key component of acoustic but not categorical deviation effects. Taken together, these findings support recent assertions that independent mechanisms drive acoustic and categorical deviation effects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis Group, 2022. Vol. 5, no 1-2, p. 1-24
Keywords [en]
Acoustic deviant, categorical deviant, attentional capture, habituation
National Category
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)
Research subject
Engineering Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-90436DOI: 10.1080/25742442.2022.2063609OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-90436DiVA, id: diva2:1656006
Note

Godkänd;2022;Nivå 0;2022-08-22 (hanlid);

Funder: University of Central Lancashire; Bial foundation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Available from: 2022-05-04 Created: 2022-05-04 Last updated: 2024-03-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Marsh, John E.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vachon, FrançoisMarsh, John E.
By organisation
Humans and Technology
Psychology (excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 71 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf