Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Environmental impacts of stormwater bioretention systems with various design and construction components
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water. Tyréns AB, Garvaregatan 4C, 602 21, Norrköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1714-4919
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5548-4397
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9541-3542
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN 0959-6526, E-ISSN 1879-1786, Vol. 359, article id 132091Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Nature-based blue-green infrastructure for urban stormwater management, such as bioretention systems, is considered to provide multiple benefits compared with conventional stormwater runoff quantity and quality control. There are a range of bioretention systems and design and construction can vary widely. Studies comparing environmental impacts between different stormwater bioretention systems with various design elements and construction components have been lacking and hence, this study aims to address this gap. Various designs of stormwater bioretention systems with differing construction components and filter media mixtures have for the first time been compared using a life cycle assessment approach. Environmental impacts related to the production, transportation, and installation phases (i.e. before operation) of four types of bioretention systems, encompassing 11 configurations, have been assessed. The various construction components and filter media mixtures used incur differing degrees of environmental impacts. The filter media mixtures requiring longer transportation distances were associated with the highest environmental impacts. In this analysis, the bioretention systems built with more kerb stone, without geotextile and a filter media with sand, soil and gravel incurred the lowest environmental impacts. Whereas the bioretention systems constructed with the most concrete and with filter media that included pumice incurred the highest environmental impacts in all categories, up to 9–24 times greater than the systems with less concrete and no pumice. When means of transportation and distances were considered further in the sensitivity analysis, the concrete intensive structures incurred the highest environmental impacts. These findings can improve design choices and selection of construction components for stormwater bioretention systems where environmental impacts are considered important.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 359, article id 132091
Keywords [en]
Best management practices, Life cycle assessment, Low impact development, Raingarden, Stormwater biofilter, Sustainable urban drainage systems
National Category
Water Engineering
Research subject
Urban Water Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-90589DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132091ISI: 000799876100002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85129497996OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-90589DiVA, id: diva2:1657516
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2021–01963Vinnova, 2016-05176
Note

Validerad;2022;Nivå 2;2022-05-11 (sofila)

Available from: 2022-05-11 Created: 2022-05-11 Last updated: 2023-09-13Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Sustainability performance of blue-green infrastructure across seasons and with various designs
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Sustainability performance of blue-green infrastructure across seasons and with various designs
2022 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) affect societal development within multiple sectors, both strategically and at street level. For instance, SDG 6 and SDG 11 have contributed to a shift in urban stormwater management that has traditionally been pipe-based, including only control of runoff volumes, to a more multi-functional nature-based blue-green infrastructure (BGI), where"blue" areas are characterized by (temporarily or permanent) open water and "green" areas by vegetative systems. As an alternative drainage approach, the use of BGI was developed and primarily evaluated in regions with temperate climates where a recent focus has been the role of BGI as providers of multiple ecosystem services within an urban context.

However, as the use of BGI expands into non-temperate zones, there is a clear need to address the fact that these nature-based systems are not only blue and green. For example, in northern climates BGI systems e.g., street-scale bioretention systems include white aspects (i.e. snow) for varying time periods. Whilst the design options for bioretention are varied and complex, (e.g., differing combinations of construction styles, filter materials and plants) research into the impact of alternative design options has focused on technical evaluations, i.e., the impact on pollution treatment and/or hydraulic control of stormwater. Knowledge of how these different bioretention designs affect other sustainability criteria, such as economic, social, and environmental aspects, needs to be fully developed.

The purpose of this licentiate thesis was to characterise and compare different street-scale bioretention designs to gain a better understanding of the relative sustainability of different bioretention systems and how the use of BGI can contribute to SDG delivery. In addition, the aim was to lay the theoretical foundation for an extended BGI concept by including white urban environments within the concept of blue-green-white infrastructure (BGWI). The overall goal was to contribute with new, relevant knowledge about the relative sustainability of alternative design aspects for bioretention systems in particular and the implications for BGI in general. A review of the literature informed the identification and approaches to benchmarking a series of social, economic, and technical-environmental criteria. In a life cycle assessment and a multi-criteria analysis, 12 different designs of bioretentions were evaluated. The results showed that, although design features had a large impact on the performance of bioretentions, no single design configuration scored highest across all sustainability criteria. The best performance in relation to social criteria was associated with the use of trees and smaller volumes of pumice in the filter material mixture. In the economic criteria, costs increased when using concrete constructions and a complex mixture of filter materials. Bioretention systems with a water-saturated submerged zone and a variety of plant species outperformed the other systems in the technical-environmental criteria.

The foundation of and justification for the concept of BGWI was developed in a perspective essay, including the development of a theoretical framework to support the systematic expansion of BGI to BGWI and to inform and align future studies. The framework identifies the potential for the delivery of a wider range of ecosystem services via BGWI in comparison to BGI. However, while the technical functionality of BGI in temperate climates has an established evidence base, its performance in cold climates (as BGWI) is less well evaluated with the extension of the BGI concept to BGWI identified as an opportunity to address these knowledge gaps in a way that is sensitive to seasonal variations in ecosystem service delivery (both positive and negative).

The results from this licentiate thesis can be directly used in both the strategic and practical planning of sustainable urban stormwater management strategies. Specifically in the early planning stage of BGI, design considerations should be made that recognise the differing role of BGI across seasons as an opportunity to aid multifunctional urban drainage implementation and thereby, the sustainable development of cities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2022
Series
Licentiate thesis / Luleå University of Technology, ISSN 1402-1757
National Category
Water Engineering
Research subject
Urban Water Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-93715 (URN)978-91-8048-206-6 (ISBN)978-91-8048-207-3 (ISBN)
Presentation
2022-12-15, B192, Luleå tekniska universitet, Luleå, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Funder
Vinnova, 2016-05176Swedish Research Council Formas, 2021-01963
Available from: 2022-11-02 Created: 2022-11-02 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Öhrn Sagrelius, PärBlecken, GodeckeHedström, AnnelieAshley, RichardViklander, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Öhrn Sagrelius, PärBlecken, GodeckeHedström, AnnelieAshley, RichardViklander, Maria
By organisation
Architecture and Water
In the same journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Water Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 714 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf