System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The impact of mineral resource extraction on communities: How the vulnerable are harmed
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Humans and Technology. Environment for Development Initiative, University of Gothenburg, Box 645, Gothenburg SE 405 30, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3581-4704
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: The Extractive Industries and Society, ISSN 2214-790X, E-ISSN 2214-7918, Vol. 10, article id 101090Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Mining projects across the globe face controversy over the loss of community welfare, particularly to the detriment of vulnerable groups. However, few studies have analyzed how extractive activities affect community and individual welfare from a national micro-scale perspective. Using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), this study examines how mining activities impact the well-being of surrounding communities and the loss of livelihoods and health experienced by vulnerable groups within communities. The results showed that mining caused 18.5% of income loss and 13.6% of health loss among community residents. Vulnerable groups suffer more than the average community member. For example, women lost 28.1% more personal income than men. Differences in the ability of different groups in the community to resist adverse shocks from mining also exacerbate the level of inequality within the community. Mining has led to a 1.7% increase in community inequality. Communities close to mining activities have a higher poverty incidence than others (33.9% increase). However, the impact of extractive industries is spatially heterogeneous due to geographic, cultural and economic differences. In some areas resource extraction has contributed to community well-being (i.e., mountainous areas). These findings encourage decision makers to adopt more flexible resource management mechanisms.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 10, article id 101090
Keywords [en]
Mining, Health, Income, Community inequality, China
National Category
Climate Science
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-90824DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2022.101090ISI: 000812835500002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85130326162OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-90824DiVA, id: diva2:1662274
Note

Validerad;2022;Nivå 2;2022-06-30 (sofila);

Funder: Major Project of National Social Science Foundation of China (21&ZD106); Natural Science Foundation of China (72074197, 71991482, 71991480, 72164002); Open Fund Project of Hubei Provincial Research Base for Regional Innovation Capacity Monitoring and Analysis Soft Science (HBQY2022z11); Major Research Projects of Guangxi Department of Natural Resources in 2019 (Sub-bid C), (GXZC2019-G3-25122-GXGL-C).

Available from: 2022-05-31 Created: 2022-05-31 Last updated: 2025-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin
By organisation
Humans and Technology
In the same journal
The Extractive Industries and Society
Climate Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 207 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf