Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Tenancy and energy choices in Rwanda. A replication and extension study
Environmental Policy and Research Unit, School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town, South Africa; Henry J Austin Health Center, 321 N. Warren Street, Trenton 08618, NJ, USA.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Humans and Technology. Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg, Box 645, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3581-4704
Environmental Policy and Research Unit, School of Economics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7701, Cape Town, South Africa.
2022 (English)In: World Development Perspectives, ISSN 2452-2929, Vol. 26, article id 100429Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper replicates and extends the study by Martey (2019) by investigating the effect of house ownership patterns and rental status on energy choices for lighting and cooking within the context of Rwanda. Unlike Ghana, Rwanda has a unique house ownership policy which could have implications on the findings of Martey (2019). As an extension, our study explores the heterogeneous effect of tenancy on energy choices across gender of households’ heads and households’ geographical location (rural–urban). Using a bivariate probit model and the fifth Integrated Household Living Conditions Survey data of Rwanda, we find that rental status and dwelling type have varying effects on cooking and lighting fuel choices. Our results show that renters relative to owner-occupants in urban households are more likely to use transition fuels like charcoal for cooking than in rural areas. The result for lighting energy is, however, inconclusive for rural and urban households. We find that female-headed households are more likely to adopt cleaner cooking energy choices. The study only partly supports the energy ladder hypothesis which suggests how evidence does not always provide conclusive support of this hypothesis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 26, article id 100429
Keywords [en]
Cooking fuel, Lighting fuel, Dwelling type, Rental status, Bivariate model
National Category
Energy Engineering Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-90844DOI: 10.1016/j.wdp.2022.100429ISI: 000813055700002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85131097840OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-90844DiVA, id: diva2:1663457
Note

Validerad;2022;Nivå 2;2022-06-02 (joosat);

Available from: 2022-06-02 Created: 2022-06-02 Last updated: 2022-10-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Amuakwa-Mensah, Franklin
By organisation
Humans and Technology
Energy EngineeringEconomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 91 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf