Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Performance Comparison of Control Strategies for a Variable-Thrust Solid-Propellant Rocket Motor
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Space Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7445-6711
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Space Technology. INNOSPACE Brazil, Av. São João 2375, São José dos Campos 12242-000, Brazil.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8959-5319
2022 (English)In: Aerospace, ISSN 2226-4310, Vol. 9, no 6, article id 325Article in journal (Refereed) [Artistic work] Published
Abstract [en]

This paper deals with a performance comparison of the control algorithm for a variable-thrust solid-propellant rocket motor (VTSRM). To do this, we develop a simulation model of a VTSRM considering characteristic changes in the combustor and design control systems for pressure and thrust. We use three types of control algorithms for the pressure control: classical PID control, feedback linearization control, and fuzzy PID control, and two control algorithms for thrust control: classical PID control and fuzzy PID control. Finally, we compare the performance of each control system through a numerical simulation using step responses. Through this work, we check that feedback linearization is better in pressure control, and fuzzy PID control is more appropriate in thrust control. Especially using fuzzy PID control, we can get fast settling with a small undershoot even if the system is a nonminimum phase system.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2022. Vol. 9, no 6, article id 325
Keywords [en]
variable-thrust solid-propellant rocket motor, pressure control, thrust control, nonminimum phase system, performance comparison
National Category
Aerospace Engineering
Research subject
Onboard space systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-91541DOI: 10.3390/aerospace9060325ISI: 000816526600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85132551798OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-91541DiVA, id: diva2:1671533
Note

Validerad;2022;Nivå 2;2022-06-29 (sofila)

Available from: 2022-06-17 Created: 2022-06-17 Last updated: 2022-09-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Cha, Jihyoungde Oliviera, Élcio Jeronimo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cha, Jihyoungde Oliviera, Élcio Jeronimo
By organisation
Space Technology
Aerospace Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 90 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf