Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
In-depth purification of spent pot-lining by oxidation-expansion acid leaching: A comparative study
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China.
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China.
School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China.
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, China.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Separation and Purification Technology, ISSN 1383-5866, E-ISSN 1873-3794, Vol. 303, article id 122313Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Spent pot lining (SPL) is a hazardous solid waste generated after overhauling the aluminum electrolytic cell. SPL contains carbon resources with high graphitization and toxic impurities, such as NaF, Na3AlF6, and CaF2. These toxic substances are difficult to remove from graphite completely. This study introduces an innovative method of oxidation-expansion acid leaching (OEAL) to eliminate impurities inside the graphitized carbon. For such a purpose, typical purification methods (conventional leaching, flotation-acid leaching) were investigated and compared to OEAL. The experimental outcomes indicated that the process efficiency for removing SPL impurities by various methods had the following sequence from high to low: OEAL > flotation-acid leaching > conventional leaching. The maximum SPL impurities removal rate by conventional leaching and flotation-acid leaching was 89.65 %, while it was 99.36 % with the OEAL method. For understanding fundamental aspects of the SPL impurity removal, their rejection mechanisms in the examined methods were systematically studied by different instrumentals and chemical analysis techniques. As a result of the reaction between H+ and residuals during OEAL process, the distance between graphitized carbon layers expands. This expansion resulted in a qualitative improvement in the SPL impurity removal by OEAL, making SPL one of the graphite or graphene oxide resources.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 303, article id 122313
Keywords [en]
Spent pot lining, Oxidation-expansion acid leaching, Deep impurity removal, Graphite
National Category
Materials Chemistry Metallurgy and Metallic Materials
Research subject
Mineral Processing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-93670DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122313ISI: 000871021400002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85139732896OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-93670DiVA, id: diva2:1705205
Note

Validerad;2022;Nivå 2;2022-10-21 (hanlid);

Funder: Colleges and Universities of Henan Province (22A450003); National Natural Science Foundation of China (52204296); Henan Province Science and Technology Research Project (China) (222102320398)

Available from: 2022-10-21 Created: 2022-10-21 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chelgani, Saeed Chehreh
By organisation
Minerals and Metallurgical Engineering
In the same journal
Separation and Purification Technology
Materials ChemistryMetallurgy and Metallic Materials

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf