Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Software Ecosystems Now and in the Future: A Definition, Systematic Literature Review, and Integration Into the Business and Digital Ecosystem Literature
Department of Management and Organisation, Hanken School of Economics, Helsingfors, Finland.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5565-953X
FLO Department, Hanken Svenska Handelshogskolan Foretagsledning och organisation, Helsingfors, Finland.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Business Administration and Industrial Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3255-414X
Business Lab, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0389-7410
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: IEEE transactions on engineering management, ISSN 0018-9391, E-ISSN 1558-0040, Vol. 71, p. 12243-12258Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Business settings and ecosystems have in the past three decades been transformed by software utilization. It is being applied in several industries shaping innovation—platforms—and business characteristics, thus attracting ever more interest from both practitioners and researchers. During the last 10 years, research on software ecosystems (SECOs) has expanded, and is strongly related to the development of digital ecosystems. This expansion has led to the need to review the status of SECO research, and the present article provides a state-of-the-art literature review on the topic. We explain the connection between the relatively new research field of SECOs and the traditional streams of ecosystem research. This article contributes novel definitions of SECOs and SECO configuration, and proposes a theoretical model illustrating the relationship between vital contingency categories and processes. We identify significant research gaps and present a future research agenda.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2024. Vol. 71, p. 12243-12258
Keywords [en]
Architecture, business ecosystems (BEs), contingency factors, orchestration, review, software ecosystems (SECOs)
National Category
Software Engineering Business Administration
Research subject
Entrepreneurship and Innovation
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-94343DOI: 10.1109/tem.2022.3216633ISI: 000881960000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85141597564OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-94343DiVA, id: diva2:1714387
Note

Validerad;2024;Nivå 2;2024-08-15 (sofila);

Available from: 2022-11-29 Created: 2022-11-29 Last updated: 2024-08-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Parida, Vinit

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Burstrom, ThommieParida, VinitWartiovaara, Markus
By organisation
Business Administration and Industrial Engineering
In the same journal
IEEE transactions on engineering management
Software EngineeringBusiness Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 92 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf