Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of Constant PID Controller and Adaptive PID Controller via Reinforcement Learning for a Rehabilitation Robot
University of Technology Sydney in Sydney, NSW.
LuleƄ University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Machine Elements. Medical & Biological Engineering, University of Technology Sydney in Sydney; School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Leeds, UK.
School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology Sydney.
2022 (English)In: 2022 Australian & New Zealand Control Conference (ANZCC), IEEE, 2022, p. 218-223Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Effectively tuning a PID controller can be difficult without prior experience or knowledge of the system being controlled. Reinforcement learning is a tool that allows automatic PID tuning with adaptability to environmental change. This technique was utilised for a single degree-of-freedom robot designed for human interaction, proving the validity of the TD3PG algorithm for reference tracking and rehabilitation exercises. These results were measured by the root mean square error of the system and compared to a classical PID controller to determine whether the adaptability improved the system tracking ability. Results showed the classical PID controller resulted in smaller RMSE measurements for a multitude of input signals including sine waves and multi-step functions when the environment remained constant. The adaptive PID controller resulted in smaller RMSE measurements for all input signals when the environment changed to reduce the amount of torque applied to the plant, representing a motor power failure. It is believed that a classic PID controller is better suited for systems with low input frequency and low system uncertainty while adaptive PID controllers are better for systems with changing environments or input signals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE, 2022. p. 218-223
Series
Australian and New Zealand Control Conference, ISSN 2767-7230, E-ISSN 2767-7257
Keywords [en]
Adaptive Control, Human-Machine Interactions, Rehabilitation Robotics, Reinforcement Learning
National Category
Control Engineering
Research subject
Machine Elements
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-95572DOI: 10.1109/ANZCC56036.2022.9966949Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85144599637ISBN: 978-1-6654-9887-6 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-95572DiVA, id: diva2:1735588
Conference
2022 Australian & New Zealand Control Conference (ANZCC), November 24-25, 2022, Gold Coast, Australia
Available from: 2023-02-09 Created: 2023-02-09 Last updated: 2023-05-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus
By organisation
Machine Elements
Control Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 65 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf