Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Expert reviews uncorked: Contrasting the differences in the language used in online reviews of white and red wine
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Business Administration and Industrial Engineering. Graduate School of Business University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9575-6676
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Business Administration and Industrial Engineering. University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3486-8292
Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada.
University of Malta, Malta.
2023 (English)In: Journal of Wine Research, ISSN 0957-1264, E-ISSN 1469-9672, Vol. 34, no 2, p. 140-154Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Consumers today are well accustomed to a digitized consumer journey, actively seeking social proof from online customer reviews to guide consumption decisions. These review platforms have been shown to be influential in guiding consumer behavior across many product and service categories. The language used to describe products on review platforms is of importance, given its potential to influence consumer perceptions and purchase intentions. Despite this, little attention is placed on the language used in reviews. In order to address this gap, this research sought to analyze and contrast the language used in online customer reviews within the wine category, by contrasting the lexical characteristics of reviews of white and red wine. The research made use of 2917 online wine reviews for four different varietals, two red wine (cabernet sauvignon and shiraz) and two white wine (chardonnay and sauvignon blanc) varietals. The Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software was used to conduct a lexical analysis, with the results indicating both similarities and differences between the reviews of red and white wine varietals. The results provide insight into the lexical components of the wine reviews and the implications that these bear on the perceived usefulness of the review.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2023. Vol. 34, no 2, p. 140-154
Keywords [en]
consumer behavior computerized text analysis, lexical analysis, LIWC, Online customer reviews, wine
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Industrial Marketing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-96615DOI: 10.1080/09571264.2023.2190086Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85150932985OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-96615DiVA, id: diva2:1751906
Note

Validerad;2023;Nivå 1;2023-06-30 (joosat);

Available from: 2023-04-20 Created: 2023-04-20 Last updated: 2023-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ferreira, CaitlinRobertson, Jeandri

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ferreira, CaitlinRobertson, Jeandri
By organisation
Business Administration and Industrial Engineering
In the same journal
Journal of Wine Research
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 130 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf