Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effect of hatch distance on the microestructure and mechanical properties of 316 L built by the L-PBF process
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Material Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2560-5703
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Material Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5921-1935
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Material Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3661-9262
2022 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF) process is an additive manufacturing (AM) process of building parts that uses the high power of the laser to melt the fine powder bed and form a structure, as shown in figure 1 (a). As a result, L-PBF is a promising technique that has likely demonstrated great interest in producing a complex part with near-net-shape design in the area of high-performance applications [1-4]. However, the defects formed during the manufacturing process affect the mechanical properties of a component, as seen in Figure 1 (b). Therefore, track remelting is required to avoid defects and thus low process efficiency [4], as shown in Figure 1 (c). In this study, five different hatch distances of 20 µm, 50 µm, 80 µm, 110 µm, and 140 µm of 316 L stainless steel were studied. To understand the effect of different hatch distances on microstructure, including crystallographic orientation and hardness, EBSD and nanoindentation hardness techniques are used. In addition, the porosity formed is calculated and distinguished (different defects, such as lack of fusion, gas pores, and keyhole defects) using image analysis software MIPAR.(a)(b)(c) Figure 1:(a) Arrangement of the building of tracks and layers during the L-PBF process,(b) illustration of cavity formation, and (c) various times of remelting while building a new build track [4].

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022.
National Category
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology
Research subject
Engineering Materials
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-97924OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-97924DiVA, id: diva2:1763014
Conference
11th EEIGM International Conference on Advanced Materials Research, June 16-17, 2022, Barcelona, Spain
Available from: 2023-06-06 Created: 2023-06-06 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Abstract

Authority records

Mishra, PragyaÅkerfeldt, PiaAntti, Marta-Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mishra, PragyaÅkerfeldt, PiaAntti, Marta-Lena
By organisation
Material Science
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 138 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf