Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Supplementary Cementitious Materials in Building Blocks—Diagnosing Opportunities in Sub-Saharan Africa
Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, 75237 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6487-5522
Department of Civil and Industrial Engineering, Uppsala University, 75237 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8008-7913
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Sustainability, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 15, no 7, article id 5822Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Sustainable building should at least be affordable and carbon neutral. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is a region struggling with housing affordability. Residential buildings are often constructed using block-based materials. These are increasingly produced using ordinary Portland cement (PC), which has a high carbon footprint. Using alternative Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) for block production might reduce the footprint and price. The purpose is to assess the level of information for SCM use in blocks in SSA and to use this information for Diagnosing the improvement potential as part of an Opportunity Study. Results from the scoping review show that aggregated information on SCMs and the quantities available is limited. Diagnosing the theoretical improvement potential in using cassava peel ash, rice husk ash, corn cob ash, volcanic ash and calcined clays, indicates that SCMs could represent a yearly value of approximately USD 400 million, which could be transferred from buying cement to local production. The use of SCMs could save 1.7 million tonnes of CO2 per year and create some 50,000 jobs. About 5% of the PC used for block production could be substituted, indicating that, in addition to using SCMs, other solutions are needed to secure production of sustainable blocks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2023. Vol. 15, no 7, article id 5822
Keywords [en]
sustainable housing, supplementary cementitious material, sustainability opportunity study, diagnosing potential, alternative binders, block production, sub-Saharan Africa
National Category
Construction Management Other Materials Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-103187DOI: 10.3390/su15075822ISI: 000970431700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85152669777OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-103187DiVA, id: diva2:1816786
Funder
Swedish Research Council FormasVinnovaSwedish Research Council
Note

Part of: Special Issue "Framework for Managing Sustainable Development"

License full text: CC BY

Available from: 2023-12-04 Created: 2023-12-04 Last updated: 2024-03-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Isaksson, Raine

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Isaksson, RaineRosvall, MaxMarangu, Joseph MwitiValentini, Luca
In the same journal
Sustainability
Construction ManagementOther Materials Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 61 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf