Mining is a high-risk industry, so efficiency and safety are key priorities. As mines continue to go deeper and exploit low-grade deposits, bulk mining methods, such as sublevel caving (SLC), have become increasingly important. SLC is suitable for massive steeply dipping ore bodies and is known for its high degree of mechanisation, productivity, and low operational cost. Moreover, technological developments and mechanisation have allowed these methods to be applied at greater depths. In modern mechanised mines Load haul dump (LHD) machines are central to achieving the desired productivity. Therefore, automation of LHDs and their increasing use in mines make it crucial to understand the performance of these machines in actual mining environments. The aim of this research was to understand the differences in the productivity of semiautonomous and manual LHDs and identify how external factors impact the performance of these machines in SLC operations. The research also investigated how LHD operator training could improve the loading efficiency.

Performance data for semi-autonomous and manual LHDs were collected from LKAB’s Kiirunavaara mine’s central database, GIRON. These data were used to compare cycle times and payloads of semi-autonomous and manual LHDs. The data were filtered and sorted so that only data where both machine types were operating in the same area (crosscut, ring, and ore pass) were used. To understand the impact of external factors, data on the occurrence of boulders were collected from LKAB’s Malmberget mine by recording videos of LHD buckets, while the data on operator training were obtained by performing baseline mapping and conducting a questionnaire study with the LHD operators at LKAB’s Kiirunavaara mine.

The results of the comparative analysis of manual and semi-autonomous LHDs showed the mean payload was 0.34 tonnes higher for manual LHD machines. However, the differences were not consistent across different areas of the mine. Similarly, when comparing the cycle times, in 57% of the studied area, manual LHDs had lower cycle time, while the opposite was true in the remaining 43% of the areas. Therefore, the differences in cycle time and payload due to mode of operation are not conclusive, meaning that one machine type does not completely outperform the other. This highlights the importance of understanding the external factors that cause such differences. Moreover, the findings emphasize the need to upgrade LHD operator training based on pedagogical principles and the inclusion of new technologies to enhance loading efficiency and increase overall productivity.