Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Which urban and landscape qualities make Arctic villages attractive? The Torne River villages in Sweden
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water. Departments of Architecture and Arts, University Iuav of Venice, Venezia, Italy.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2887-0414
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0009-0003-0555-7094
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6831-8857
2024 (English)In: European Planning Studies, ISSN 0965-4313, E-ISSN 1469-5944, Vol. 32, no 8, p. 1731-1751Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Throughout history, small village communities in the Arctic have developed several strategies to ensure their survival. Along the Torne River, some fishing communities have produced specific architectures, landscapes, and social strategies to support their communities and survive for centuries. However, depopulation, aging, climate change, and the expansion of the extraction industry are threatening these villages. The hypothesis is that traditional fishing villages situated alongside rivers possess architectural, urban, and social attributes that can enhance outdoor activities linked to water and green spaces and enable the long-term social sustainability of Arctic villages. The innovative approach of the paper involves combining a mapping methodology of green and blue infrastructure with the architectural, urban, social and historical values of a place to identify design strategies for improving attractiveness demonstrating its efficacy, particularly in small, local-scale villages. The paper investigates the villages of Kukkola and Korpikylä taken as emblematic examples and explores the architectural and landscape value in relation to the green–blue infrastructure.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2024. Vol. 32, no 8, p. 1731-1751
Keywords [en]
Arctic towns, attractivity, Green–blue infrastructure, outdoor recreation
National Category
Architectural Engineering Architecture
Research subject
Architecture
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-105614DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2024.2349753ISI: 001227791400001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85193701649OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-105614DiVA, id: diva2:1861170
Note

Validerad;2024;Nivå 2;2024-08-15 (sofila);

Funder: Lerici Foundation Research Grant; Arctic Five Chair in Architecture and Planning

Available from: 2024-05-27 Created: 2024-05-27 Last updated: 2025-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Tornieri, StefanoMa, JingRizzo, Agatino

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tornieri, StefanoMa, JingRizzo, Agatino
By organisation
Architecture and Water
In the same journal
European Planning Studies
Architectural EngineeringArchitecture

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 117 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf