Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Methodological development of a specific tool for assessing acceptability of assistive systems of powered two-wheeler-riders
Factum Chaloupka and Risser OG, Danhausergasse 6/4, 1040 Wien.
Factum Chaloupka and Risser OG, Danhausergasse 6/4, 1040 Wien.
Research School of Psychology, Australian National University.
National Technical University of Athens.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: IET Intelligent Transport Systems, ISSN 1751-956X, E-ISSN 1751-9578, Vol. 9, no 1, p. 12-21Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research on the acceptability of assistive systems for improving the safety of powered two-wheelers (PTWs) is a pressing issue. The use of safety-enhancing assistive systems for motorised vehicles, including advanced driver assistance systems and in-vehicle information systems is widespread in many countries. Yet, there is only a limited number of equivalent intelligent transport systems (ITS) for PTWs, namely advanced rider assistance systems and on-bike information systems. This study describes the methodological development of a specific tool for assessing motorcyclists' acceptability of ITS, as part of the motorcyclists' profiling questionnaire (MOPROQ). There were three stages of development. First, a literature review was undertaken to assess the current state of the art regarding ITS for PTWs and to determine the most relevant facets of acceptability that should be measured. Second, a series of focus group interviews were conducted to explore riders' attitudes towards ITS. Finally, the focus group results were used to develop a large-scale survey (MOPROQ), which was administered to an initial sample of over 6000 riders internationally. The designed tool can be used as a basis for the determination of rider acceptability of ITS systems in the future.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 9, no 1, p. 12-21
National Category
Architectural Engineering
Research subject
Architecture
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-2950DOI: 10.1049/iet-its.2014.0026ISI: 000347949900003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84921496504Local ID: 0b18b5b9-c9e8-4c07-b473-9ffb5d7837ddOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-2950DiVA, id: diva2:975805
Note

Validerad; 2015; Nivå 2; 20150204 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2019-08-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Leden, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Leden, Lars
By organisation
Architecture and Water
In the same journal
IET Intelligent Transport Systems
Architectural Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 252 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf