Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Variability in muscle fibre areas in whole human quadriceps muscle: how to reduce sampling errors in biopsy techniques
1989 (English)In: Clinical Physiology, ISSN 0144-5979, E-ISSN 1365-2281, Vol. 9, no 4, p. 333-343Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A single biopsy is a poor estimator of the muscle fibre cross-sectional area (CSA) for a whole human muscle because of the large variability in the fibre area within a muscle. To determine how the sampling errors in biopsy techniques can be reduced, data on the CSA of type 1 and type 2 fibres obtained from cross-sections of whole vastus lateralis muscle of young men, have been analysed statistically. To obtain a good estimate of the mean fibre CSA in a biopsy, measuring all fibres in that biopsy gives the best result. To obtain a good estimate of the mean fibre CSA for a whole muscle, the number of biopsies has a much greater influence on the sampling error than the number of fibres measured in each biopsy, but the number of biopsies needed to obtain a given sampling error can vary by a factor of two. If the fibre CSA in three or more biopsies is measured, it is sufficient to measure only 25 fibres in each biopsy. If less than three biopsies are taken, there is no worthwhile reduction in sampling error when more than 100 fibres are measured. To determine the mean fibre CSA for a whole group of individuals, our preference is to maximize the number of individuals, and only take single biopsies. In conclusion, to determine the mean fibre CSA for this particular muscle with a certain precision, we suggest analysis of three biopsies, taken from different depths of the muscle, and measurement of 25 fibres in each biopsy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1989. Vol. 9, no 4, p. 333-343
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-3574DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.1989.tb00987.xISI: A1989AH75900003PubMedID: 2766678Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0024381018Local ID: 16669c40-a85a-11de-8293-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-3574DiVA, id: diva2:976432
Note

Upprättat; 1989; 20090923 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2022-11-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lexell, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lexell, Jan
In the same journal
Clinical Physiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 27 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf