Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Process capability plots—a quality improvement tool
Luleå University of Technology.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Mathematical Science.
1999 (English)In: Quality and Reliability Engineering International, ISSN 0748-8017, E-ISSN 1099-1638, Vol. 15, no 3, p. 213-227Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We introduce the concept of process capability plots, which are powerful tools to monitor and improve the capability of industrial processes. An advantage of using a process capability plot, compared with using a traditional process capability index alone, when deciding whether a process can be considered capable or not, is that we will instantly get information about the location and spread of the studied characteristic. When the process is non-capable, the plots are helpful when trying to understand if it is the variability, the deviation from target or both that need to be reduced to improve the capability. In this way the proposed graphical methods give a clear direction of quality improvement. We evaluate two different process capability plots, the (δ*, γ*)-plot and the confidence rectangle plot, from a theoretical as well as a practical point of view. When studying them from a theoretical point of view, among other things, a simulation study is conducted to investigate the ability of each of the two methods to identify that a process is capable when it actually is. The comparison from a practical point of view is made by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods in different practical situations. Based on the above-mentioned comparisons, the recommendation is that the practitioner should use the (δ*, γ*)-plot.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1999. Vol. 15, no 3, p. 213-227
National Category
Reliability and Maintenance Probability Theory and Statistics
Research subject
Quality Technology & Management; Mathematical Statistics with special emphasis on Industrial Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-4861DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1638(199905/06)15:3<213::AID-QRE245>3.0.CO;2-OISI: 000081154500008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0001526256Local ID: 2dccba00-c02b-11db-834c-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-4861DiVA, id: diva2:977735
Note

Godkänd; 1999; 20070219 (evan)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2022-11-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Vännman, Kerstin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vännman, Kerstin
By organisation
Luleå University of TechnologyMathematical Science
In the same journal
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Reliability and MaintenanceProbability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 145 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf