Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of different plasma excitation and calibration methods in the analysis of geological materials by optical emission spectrometry
Luleå University of Technology.
1979 (English)In: Analytical Chemistry, ISSN 0003-2700, E-ISSN 1520-6882, Vol. 51, no 4, p. 516-520Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A comparative study has been made of different dissolution and calibration methods for analyses by optical emission spectrometry (OES) utilizing inductively coupled plasma (ICP) and capacitively coupled microwave plasma (MWP) as excitation sources. The test substances were geological standard rocks, in which SlO2, Al2O3, TiO2, Fe2O3, MnO, MgO CaO, Na2O, Ba, and some traces were determined. The results show that analyses by MWP-OES are severely disturbed by matrix effects; only in the presence of large quantities of ionization buffers e.g., [Sr(NO3)2] can MWP-OES yield rock analyses of very good quality. No buffers are needed for analyses by ICP-OES, for which the matrix effects are remarkably low. ICP-OES may suffer from annoying nebulizer disturbances when concentrated solutions are used but, with properly diluted solutions, all major and many trace elements can routinely be analyzed in 50-mg rock samples. MWP-OES on the other hand is poorly suited for trace element determinationsA comparative study has been made of different dissolution and calibration methods for analyses by optical emission spectrometry (OES) utilizing inductively coupled plasma (ICP) and capacitively coupled microwave plasma (MWP) as excitation sources. The test substances were geological standard rocks, in which SlO2, Al2O3, TiO2, Fe2O3, MnO, MgO CaO, Na2O, Ba, and some traces were determined. The results show that analyses by MWP-OES are severely disturbed by matrix effects; only in the presence of large quantities of ionization buffers e.g., [Sr(NO3)2] can MWP-OES yield rock analyses of very good quality. No buffers are needed for analyses by ICP-OES, for which the matrix effects are remarkably low. ICP-OES may suffer from annoying nebulizer disturbances when concentrated solutions are used but, with properly diluted solutions, all major and many trace elements can routinely be analyzed in 50-mg rock samples. MWP-OES on the other hand is poorly suited for trace element determinations. © 1979 American Chemical Society.

Abstract [en]

A comparative study has been made of different dissolution and calibration methods for analyses by optical emission spectrometry (OES) utilizing inductively coupled plasma (ICP) and capacitively coupled microwave plasma (MWP) as excitation sources. The test substances were geological standard rocks, in which SlO2, Al2O3, TiO2, Fe2O3, MnO, MgO CaO, Na2O, Ba, and some traces were determined. The results show that analyses by MWP-OES are severely disturbed by matrix effects; only in the presence of large quantities of ionization buffers e.g., [Sr(NO3)2] can MWP-OES yield rock analyses of very good quality. No buffers are needed for analyses by ICP-OES, for which the matrix effects are remarkably low. ICP-OES may suffer from annoying nebulizer disturbances when concentrated solutions are used but, with properly diluted solutions, all major and many trace elements can routinely be analyzed in 50-mg rock samples. MWP-OES on the other hand is poorly suited for trace element determinations. © 1979 American Chemical Society.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1979. Vol. 51, no 4, p. 516-520
National Category
Geochemistry
Research subject
Applied Geology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-5578DOI: 10.1021/ac50040a015ISI: A1979GP24300017Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0018453697Local ID: 3b674ec0-07fd-11de-bf94-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-5578DiVA, id: diva2:978452
Note
Godkänd; 1979; 20090303 (bajo)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2021-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Burman, Jan-Ola

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Burman, Jan-Ola
By organisation
Luleå University of Technology
In the same journal
Analytical Chemistry
Geochemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 208 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf