Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Optimal Placement of Accelerometers for the Detection of Everyday Activities
University of Ulster. School of Computing and Mathematics.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Computer Science.
University of Ulster. School of Computing and Mathematics.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Computer Science.
Show others and affiliations
2013 (English)In: Sensors, ISSN 1424-8220, E-ISSN 1424-8220, Vol. 13, no 7, p. 9183-9200Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article describes an investigation to determine the optimal placement of accelerometers for the purpose of detecting a range of everyday activities. The paper investigates the effect of combining data from accelerometers placed at various bodily locations on the accuracy of activity detection. Eight healthy males participated within the study. Data were collected from six wireless tri-axial accelerometers placed at the chest, wrist, lower back, hip, thigh and foot. Activities included walking, running on a motorized treadmill, sitting, lying, standing and walking up and down stairs. The Support Vector Machine provided the most accurate detection of activities of all the machine learning algorithms investigated. Although data from all locations provided similar levels of accuracy, the hip was the best single location to record data for activity detection using a Support Vector Machine, providing small but significantly better accuracy than the other investigated locations. Increasing the number of sensing locations from one to two or more statistically increased the accuracy of classification. There was no significant difference in accuracy when using two or more sensors. It was noted, however, that the difference in activity detection using single or multiple accelerometers may be more pronounced when trying to detect finer grain activities. Future work shall therefore investigate the effects of accelerometer placement on a larger range of these activities

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 13, no 7, p. 9183-9200
National Category
Media and Communication Technology
Research subject
Mobile and Pervasive Computing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-5827DOI: 10.3390/s130709183ISI: 000328612800062Local ID: 403d5d70-017f-4e22-8430-1117523ed033OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-5827DiVA, id: diva2:978703
Note
Validerad; 2014; 20140120 (andbra)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2018-07-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Kikhia, BaselBoytsov, AndreyHallberg, JosefSynnes, Kåre

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kikhia, BaselBoytsov, AndreyHallberg, JosefSynnes, Kåre
By organisation
Computer Science
In the same journal
Sensors
Media and Communication Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 61 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf