Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fatigue of 0.55C-1.72Si Steel with Tempered Martensitic and Carbide-Free Bainitic Microstructures
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Material Science.
Luleå University of Technology.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Mechanics of Solid Materials.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Material Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9100-7982
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters), ISSN 1006-7191, E-ISSN 2194-1289, Vol. 27, no 1, p. 55-62Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

High-Si spring steel was heat treated in three different ways: Quenching and tempering at 460 °C to obtain a tempered martensite microstructure, and austempering at 300 and 350 °C, respectively, to obtain two different carbide-free bainitic microstructures. In the steel austempered at 350 °C, both the bainite lath thickness and retained austenite content were higher than those of the steel austempered at 300 °C. Rotating-bending fatigue tests were done in order to evaluate the effect of each heat treatment on the high-cycle fatigue behavior of the steel. When the austempering temperature was 300 °C, the endurance limit was increased by 25% despite a 5% reduction in tensile strength when compared with that of the quenched and tempered steel. The relationship between endurance limit [Rfat (50%)] and ultimate tensile strength (Rm) was higher for the austempered samples in comparison with that of the quenched and tempered material. Therefore, it is believed that the presence of retained austenite affects the relationship between endurance limit and tensile strength.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 27, no 1, p. 55-62
National Category
Other Materials Engineering Applied Mechanics Other Mechanical Engineering
Research subject
Engineering Materials; Solid Mechanics; Machine Elements; Centre - Centre for High Performance Steel (CHS)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-6071DOI: 10.1007/s40195-013-0020-4ISI: 000333727900008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84900630234Local ID: 445075f9-f36e-499d-bf30-07af86c43d98OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-6071DiVA, id: diva2:978948
Note

Validerad; 2014; 20140129 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2025-02-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Leiro, AlejandroSundin, Karl-GustafVuorinen, EsaPrakash, Braham

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Leiro, AlejandroSundin, Karl-GustafVuorinen, EsaPrakash, Braham
By organisation
Material ScienceLuleå University of TechnologyMechanics of Solid MaterialsMachine Elements
In the same journal
Acta Metallurgica Sinica (English Letters)
Other Materials EngineeringApplied MechanicsOther Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 360 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf