Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Managing Ethical Difficulties in Healthcare: Communicating in Inter-professional Clinical Ethics Support Sessions
Umeå University, Department of Nursing.
Umeå University, Department of Nursing.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Health Sciences, Nursing Care.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5953-8970
Department of Clinical Science/Psychiatry, Umeå University.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 5
2016 (English)In: HEC Forum, ISSN 0956-2737, E-ISSN 1572-8498, Vol. 28, no 4, p. 321-338Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Several studies show that healthcare professionals need to communicate inter-professionally in order to manage ethical difficulties. A model of clinical ethics support (CES) inspired by Habermas' theory of discourse ethics has been developed by our research group. In this version of CES sessions healthcare professionals meet inter-professionally to communicate and reflect on ethical difficulties in a cooperative manner with the aim of reaching communicative agreement or reflective consensus. In order to understand the course of action during CES, the aim of this study was to describe the communication of value conflicts during a series of inter-professional CES sessions. Ten audio- and video-recorded CES sessions were conducted over eight months and were analyzed by using the video analysis tool Transana and qualitative content analysis. The results showed that during the CES sessions the professionals as a group moved through the following five phases: a value conflict expressed as feelings of frustration, sharing disempowerment and helplessness, the revelation of the value conflict, enhancing realistic expectations, seeing opportunities to change the situation instead of obstacles. In the course of CES, the professionals moved from an individual interpretation of the situation to a common, new understanding and then to a change in approach. An open and permissive communication climate meant that the professionals dared to expose themselves, share their feelings, face their own emotions, and eventually arrive at a mutual shared reality. The value conflict was not only revealed but also resolved

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 28, no 4, p. 321-338
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-6937DOI: 10.1007/s10730-016-9303-2PubMedID: 27147521Local ID: 544b3532-c426-4747-ade3-cd5be91d3373OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-6937DiVA: diva2:979823
Note

Validerad; 2016; Nivå 1; 2016-11-02 (rokbeg)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2018-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zingmark, Karin
By organisation
Nursing Care
In the same journal
HEC Forum
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 101 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf