Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Neuropsychological Aspects of Driving After Brain Lesion: Simulator Study and On-Road Driving
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Linköping Institute of Technology, Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Pain Clinic, University Hospital, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
1997 (English)In: Applied neuropsychology, ISSN 0908-4282, E-ISSN 1532-4826, Vol. 4, no 4, p. 220-230Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

29 patients with brain lesion and 29 matched controls completed a neuropsychological test battery to assess perceptual, cognitive, and executive functioning and were tested on driving performance in a simulator and actual road conditions. The patients were socially well recovered with a high rate of employment. Patients performed significantly worse than controls on the test battery, especially on executive and cognitive functions. Patients drove as well as controls in predictable situations in the advanced simulator used In unpredictable situations, patients demonstrated longer reaction time (RT) and safety margins, as well as difficulties in allocating processing resources to a secondary task. Patients showed significantly less attention, worse traffic behavior, and less risk awareness when driving in real traffic. 41% of the patients did not pass the driving test. The neuropsychological test battery was factor analyzed into 4 factors: executive capacity, cognitive capacity, automatic attentional capacity, and simple perceptual-motor capacity. The second factor was the most significant, with a simultaneous capacity test predicting driving performance with 78% confidence.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1997. Vol. 4, no 4, p. 220-230
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-6989DOI: 10.1207/s15324826an0404_3ISI: 000208253600003PubMedID: 16318471Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0000056648Local ID: 5522eb10-2552-11dc-b6d3-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-6989DiVA, id: diva2:979875
Note

Upprättat; 1997; 20070628 (biem)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2022-03-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Alm, Håkan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Alm, Håkan
In the same journal
Applied neuropsychology
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 104 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf