Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Influence of laptop computer design and working position on physical exposure variables
Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University and Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration.
Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy and Hospital, Goteborg University.
National Institute for Working Life.
2002 (English)In: Clinical Biomechanics, ISSN 0268-0033, E-ISSN 1879-1271, Vol. 17, no 5, p. 368-375Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective. To evaluate the impact of two laptop designs (with or without palm rest) and two work situations (on desk or lap) on neck and upper limb posture, muscle activity and productivity.Design and methods. Eight healthy subjects performed a standardized typing task of 15 min duration. During the last 5 min of each test, the neck, upper arm and trunk postures were captured by a three-dimensional video system, wrist motion was measured by a biaxial electrogoniometer and muscle activity of four neck and upper limb muscles was recorded.Results. Only minor differences in postures, wrist positions and productivity were observed when comparing the two laptop designs in the same situation. Larger differences were found when comparing the two situations (desk or lap). In the desk situation, the subjects bent their heads forward less, had less backward trunk inclination and wrist extension, but more elevation of the upper arm. Higher electromyographic (EMG) levels in the trapezius and deltoid muscles and lower EMG levels in the wrist extensors were also found in the desk situation.Conclusions. Our findings do not favor one particular laptop design because only small differences in physical exposure were found. However, the workstation set up influenced the physical exposure variables, and was pinpointed as the main determinant to be considered when doing laptop work even-though no ideal situation was found. Greater physical (muscular and articular) constraints seem to be imposed to the shoulder region in the desk situation whereas the head-neck and wrist segments appear to be more stressed in the lap situation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2002. Vol. 17, no 5, p. 368-375
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-7093DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00062-3ISI: 000177107300005PubMedID: 12084541Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0036087435Local ID: 569c58f0-6fcd-11df-ab16-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-7093DiVA, id: diva2:979980
Note

Upprättat; 2002; 20100604 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2023-05-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Karlqvist, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlqvist, Lena
In the same journal
Clinical Biomechanics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 56 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf