Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Strategic alliances in Kenyan smallholder farming
Department of Economics, University of Gothenburg, WorleyParsons, EcoNomics Group.
Department of Business, Economics and Law, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall.
Department of Business, Economics and Law, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7206-6568
2014 (English)In: Business Excellence, ISSN 1846-3355, Vol. 8, no 1, p. 49-64Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Implementing and complying with standards and certifi cation oft en increases costs for supply chain actors. These increased costs are caused by upgrading production, logistics and marketing needed to achieve compliance, and can lead to the exclusion of actors from the supply chain. In particular, the exclusion of small-scale growers in developing countries as the result of the expansion and proliferation of private voluntary standards (PVS) used by large procurers has been extensively reported. Costs of PVS are per certification and the unit is usually the individual farm, regardless of its size. In much of the developing world smallholder production dominates domestic food production, and these small farms face proportionately higher costs per unit area for certification and compliance. Benefits of PVS are per production unit, giving benefits to larger farms. Developing world smallholder production tends to be on less than one hectare, giving relatively small production. Compared with the costs per farm, there is an inherent bias in many standards and certification towards larger farms. Standards in export horticulture can, potentially, incentivize a more active role for the private sector in investing in small-scale growers in ways that are mutually benefi cial for growers and exporters. Such co-investment is a feature of trading relationships and business models that are inclusive of small-scale growers. In Kenyan horticulture, donors, exporters and smallholders have in some cases managed to leverage PVS requirements into profitable local agricultural developments. In this paper, we use resource-based strategic alliance theory to explain the patterns that have evolved. We propose greater use of cooperation theory to help make more efficient economic development interventions which are complementary with private-sector investments. We explore how standards might be used to accelerate development initiatives.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 8, no 1, p. 49-64
National Category
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-7365Local ID: 5bccd6eb-1190-4a7f-a510-57efa148e798OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-7365DiVA, id: diva2:980254
Projects
Jordbruk i afrikanska länder - information och marknadsmakt
Note
Upprättat; 2014; 20141128 (jessta)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2017-11-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Stage, Jesper

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stage, Jesper
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf