Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Towards dissolution of the IS research debate: From polarization to polarity
1998 (English)In: JIT. Journal of information technology (Print), ISSN 0268-3962, E-ISSN 1466-4437, Vol. 13, no 4, p. 313-326Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The debate between 'hard' and 'soft' research approaches continues in the IS field, but with little prospect of resolution. The debate is typically characterized by tendentious arguments as advocates from each approach offer a somewhat one-sided condemnation of the counterpart from the inimical research tradition. This paper begins by relating two fictitious tales which serve to highlight the futility of research conducted at the extremity of each research approach. The dichotomies which characterize these rival factions are also summarized. The debate is then framed in terms of the polarization problem whereby IS researchers are divided geographically and paradigmatically into 'hard' and 'soft' camps. A variety of different strategies have been proposed for resolving the debate and these are discussed in detail. They are grouped into four categories, referred to as supremacism, isolationism, integration, and pluralism. Finally, the paper contends that the debate cannot be resolved, and offers the metaphor of magnetic polarity as a means of reflecting this. The paper concludes by arguing that it would be more appropriate to recast the debate at a macro level in order to accommodate different research agenda and recognize the strengths within each tradition.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1998. Vol. 13, no 4, p. 313-326
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-8623Local ID: 724ce291-84e7-4135-bc06-741a05013753OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-8623DiVA, id: diva2:981561
Note
Upprättat; 1998; 20130430 (ysko)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2018-04-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records BETA

Howcroft, Debra

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Howcroft, Debra
In the same journal
JIT. Journal of information technology (Print)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf