Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Are distal radius fractures due to fragility or to falls?: A consecutive case-control study of bone mineral density, tendency to fall, risk factors for osteoporosis, and health-related quality of life
Department of Physiotherapy, Sunderby Hospital.
Department of Orthopaedics, Sunderby Hospital.
2007 (English)In: Acta Orthopaedica, ISSN 1745-3674, E-ISSN 1745-3682, Vol. 78, no 2, p. 271-277Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background A fracture of the distal radius is considered to indicate an increased risk of future fractures, especially a hip fracture. The main causes may be osteoporosis or a tendency to fall, separately or in combination. Methods 93 women and 5 men with a recent radius fracture and the same number of controls were measured with a heel-DXL and asked to complete one questionnaire on their quality of life (SF-36), and one on risk factors. Results The mean T-score of the patients was –2.1, and for the controls it was –1.9 (p = 0.3). The patients aged over 64 years had a history of falling more often than the corresponding controls (p = 0.01), but there was no difference in T-score. By contrast, patients 45-64 years of age showed a non-significant, lower T-score (p = 0.09), but there was no difference concerning their history of falling. For all other risk factors, no differences were found between the patients and the controls. There were significant differences between the patients and the controls in some of the functions in the SF-36, due to the radius fracture. Interpretation This study indicates that the underlying cause of a distal radius fracture may be different in patients aged 45–64 years and those who are more than 64 years old.Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17453670710013799

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 78, no 2, p. 271-277
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-9428DOI: 10.1080/17453670710013799ISI: 000246988400018PubMedID: 17464618Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-34247643799Local ID: 80ac11c1-9649-4748-828c-df76cfbb2882OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-9428DiVA, id: diva2:982366
Note

Upprättat; 2007; 20130321 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2019-03-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records BETA

Persson, Gunhild Glanberg

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Persson, Gunhild Glanberg
In the same journal
Acta Orthopaedica
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 99 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf