Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Transmission and dissipation of stress wave energy at a percussive drill rod joint
Luleå tekniska universitet.
1987 (English)In: International Journal of Impact Engineering, ISSN 0734-743X, E-ISSN 1879-3509, Vol. 6, no 3, p. 157-173Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Transmission and dissipation of stress wave energy at a percussive drill rod joint is determined for three joint types, three joint preload levels, three hammer lengths ( incident wave lengths) and a range of impact velocities ( incident wave amplitudes). The energies of the incident, reflected and transmitted waves are evaluated from measured strains, and then the dissipated energy is determined as the deficit of energy in the two latter waves compared with the first. The accuracy needed is obtained by introducing a compensation factor and determining its value from the requirement of momentum conservation. The experimental results for threaded standard joints are compared with experimental results for threadless dummy joints, made in one piece, and also with theoretical results. The latter are based on one model which represents the joint as a well on a one- dimensional elastic rod (characteristics impedance or CI model) and on another model which represents the joint as a rigid mass between one-dimensional elastic rods (rigid mass or RM model). For the joints 70-100% of the incident wave energy is transmitted and 0-20% is dissipated. The corresponding figures for the dummies are 90-100% and (±)1%, repectively. The latter figure indicates the inaccuracy in the measurement and evaluation procedures. The two models agree fairly well with the dummies. Under certain conditions they also give reasonably accurate predictions for the energy transmitted through a joint. As they sometimes give quite inaccurate results for energy transmission and furthermore fail to predict energy dissipation they need be refined.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1987. Vol. 6, no 3, p. 157-173
National Category
Applied Mechanics
Research subject
Solid Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-10039DOI: 10.1016/0734-743X(87)90019-4Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0023561492Local ID: 8cc5e140-259b-11dd-9e62-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-10039DiVA, id: diva2:982979
Note
Godkänd; 1987; 20080519 (cira)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2018-07-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus
In the same journal
International Journal of Impact Engineering
Applied Mechanics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf