Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The expanding global income gap: how reliable is the evidence?
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7996-6136
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7033-9411
2002 (English)In: European Journal of Development Research, ISSN 0957-8811, E-ISSN 1743-9728, Vol. 14, no 1, p. 243-263Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Employing exchange rate determined per capita GDPs, the paper demonstrates a very sharp increase in global income inequality. In 1960, the gap between country groups representing the poorest & richest population deciles equaled 40, & there were widespread fears that the large income gap was a threat to sustainable global economic expansion. By 1995, the poor group per capita incomes had declined by almost 50% in real terms, & the gap had widened to 140. These findings are in sharp contrast to the results from the increasingly fashionable assessments employing PPP-adjusted income figures. The latter show a positive income trend for the poorest decile, & an insignificant increase in the rich/poor income gap. It is well known that exchange rate determined international GDP comparisons exaggerate the income gaps between rich & poor nations. But it is far from obvious that PPP adjustments yield results that are superior to those obtained with the help of exchange rates, when the relative gaps are compared at different points in time, or when per capita incomes are tracked over long time periods in individual countries or country groups. Our dramatic results, therefore, represent a very important second opinion on what has happened to global income distribution. 9 Tables, 2 Figures, 29 References. Adapted from the source document

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2002. Vol. 14, no 1, p. 243-263
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-10371DOI: 10.1080/714000406Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0036071449Local ID: 92bfe250-e125-11db-b0f8-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-10371DiVA, id: diva2:983313
Note
Validerad; 2002; 20070402 (keni)Available from: 2016-09-29 Created: 2016-09-29 Last updated: 2018-07-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Radetzki, MarianJonsson, Bo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Radetzki, MarianJonsson, Bo
By organisation
Social Sciences
In the same journal
European Journal of Development Research
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1851 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf