Change search
Refine search result
1 - 6 of 6
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Baglee, David
    et al.
    Institute for Automotive Manufacturing and Advanced Practices, University of Sunderland, Department of Computing, Engineering and Technology, Institute for Automotive and Manufacturing Advanced Practise, University of Sunderland, School of Computing and Technology, University of Sunderland.
    Knowles, Michael
    Institute for Automotive Manufacturing and Advanced Practices, University of Sunderland, University of Sunderland.
    Kinnunen, Sini Kaisu
    School of Business and Management, Lappeenranta University of Technology.
    Galar, Diego
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Operation, Maintenance and Acoustics.
    A proposed maintenance strategy for a wind turbine gearbox using condition monitoring techniques2016In: International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, ISSN 1460-6739, E-ISSN 1741-816X, Vol. 6, no 3, p. 386-403Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Renewable energy sources such as wind are available without limitations, but reliability is critical if pay back periods are to be met. The current reliability and failure modes of offshore wind turbines are known and have been used to develop preventive and corrective maintenance strategies but have done little to improve reliability. The analysis of gear lubricants can detect early signs of failure. Reliability centred maintenance (RCM) approach offers considerable benefit to the management of wind turbine operation, as it includes an appreciation of the impact of faults. This paper provides an overview of the application of RCM and condition monitoring techniques, to support the development of a maintenance strategy. It discusses the development of a sensor-based processing unit that can continuously monitor the lubricated systems and provide, real-time data enabling onshore staff to predict degradation anticipate problems and take remedial action before damage and failure occur

  • 2.
    Lager, Thomas
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology.
    Hörte, Sven-Åke
    Luleå University of Technology.
    Success factors for the development of process technology in process industry. Part 1: a classification system for success factors and a rating of success factors on a tactical level2005In: International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, ISSN 1460-6739, E-ISSN 1741-816X, Vol. 1, no 1, p. 82-103Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In a research project on the development of process technology in process industry, success factors have been developed and ranked by R&D managers in various sectors of the European process industry. The results are presented in two parts, of which this is Part 1. As an introduction to this part, a new classification system for success factors in R&D is developed and the final discussion in Part 2 presents a model for company implementation. The empirical results stress the importance of good technology transfer in the process development process. The results can also be seen as a shopping list and a starting point for in-company development of success factors and performance indicators for process development.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 3.
    Lager, Thomas
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology.
    Hörte, Sven-Åke
    Luleå University of Technology.
    Success factors for the development of process technology in process industry. Part 2: a ranking of success factors on an operational level and a dynamic model for company implementation2005In: International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, ISSN 1460-6739, E-ISSN 1741-816X, Vol. 1, no 1, p. 104-126Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In a research project on the development of process technology in process industry, success factors have been developed and ranked by R&D managers in various sectors of European process industry. The results are presented in two parts, of which this is Part 2 of the study. A new classification system for success factors in R&D was developed as an introduction in Part 1, and the discussion in this paper presents a model for company implementation. The empirical research results give an emerging picture of a development area, a development process and a type of development behaviour that differ markedly from product development and the product development process. The results can also be seen as a shopping list and a starting point for in-company development of success factors and performance indicators for process development.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 4.
    Larsson, Andreas
    Luleå University of Technology.
    Innovation and technology in process industry: a process management perspective on technology strategic planning2006In: International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, ISSN 1460-6739, E-ISSN 1741-816X, Vol. 1, no 3, p. 201-219Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    How do multinational corporations manage innovation and technology strategy development? The paper explores the dynamic relationship between innovation-related matters, technology-related matters and business-related matters in technology strategic planning and how its outcome is displayed and communicated. The results show that technology-related matters are either managed as part of the work process of innovation strategy formulation or divided between the work processes of business strategy formulation and innovation strategy formulation. Hence, technology-related matters are not dealt with in a work process of their own. However, the technology strategy content is separated from the innovation strategy content and business strategy content.

  • 5.
    Larsson, Andreas
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology.
    Bergfors, Markus
    Luleå University of Technology.
    Heads or tails in innovation strategy formulation? Porterian or Penrosian, let context determine2006In: International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, ISSN 1460-6739, E-ISSN 1741-816X, Vol. 1, no 4, p. 297-313Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In strategy research, resources and products can be considered two sides of the same coin. This conceptual paper turns heads into tails as it revisits the Porterian industrial economics-based Booz Allen Hamilton methodology for innovation strategy formulation from a Penrosian resource-based view. Seven propositions are generated, two distinct methodologies emerge, and four contextual factors are discussed. This paper proposes that the Penrosian methodology is more suitable in turbulent environments while the Porterian is more suitable in less turbulent environments. Furthermore, it illustrates how the resource based concept can be incorporated into a potentially very practical tool for innovation strategy formulation.

  • 6.
    Larsson, Andreas
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Industrial Organisation.
    Sugasawa, Yoshio
    Nihon University Graduate School of Business.
    A unified methodology for innovation strategy formulation: product and resource perspectives on the firm combined2007In: International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, ISSN 1460-6739, E-ISSN 1741-816X, Vol. 2, no 2, p. 118-137Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    In strategy research, resources and products can be considered two sides of the same coin. Thus, competitors can be identified not just by similarities among their products, but by similarities among their resources and capabilities as well. This conceptual paper introduces a unified version of the Booz Allen Hamilton methodology for innovation strategy formulation. It combines the product perspective with the resource perspective, building upon the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats framework and the resource-product matrix. It offers a straightforward, easy-to-apply methodology for innovation strategy formulation that integrates internal strengths and weaknesses with environmental opportunities and threats.

1 - 6 of 6
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf