Change search
Refine search result
12 1 - 50 of 57
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Berge, Erling
    et al.
    Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim.
    Carlsson, LarsLuleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Proceedings from a workshop on "Commons: Old and New": organised by the research programme Landscape, Law & Justice at the Centre for Advanced Study, Oslo, 11-13 March 20032003Collection (editor) (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 2. Blam, Juri
    et al.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Olsson, Mats-Olov
    Institutions and the emergence of markets: transition in the Irkutsk forest sector2000Report (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 3.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Anarchy and the Environment: [Review]2000In: Environmental Politics, ISSN 0964-4016, E-ISSN 1743-8934, Vol. 9, no 3, p. 157-158Article, book review (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Review of Anarchy and the Environment edited by J. Samuel Barkin and George E. Shamaugh. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1999. ISBN 0 7914 4183 0

  • 4.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Book review: Krantz Lindgren, Petra: Att färdas som man lär?: om miljömedvetenhet och bilåkande. 20012002In: Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, ISSN 0039-0747, Vol. 105, no 3, p. 259-263Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Review of Krantz Lindgren, Petra: Att färdas som man lär? : om miljömedvetenhet och bilåkande. 2001

    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 5.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Book review: Protecting the commons: a framework for resource management in the Americas2002In: Ecological Economics, ISSN 0921-8009, E-ISSN 1873-6106, Vol. 40, no 3, p. 457-458Article, book review (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Review of: Protecting the commons. A framework for resource management in the Americas Edited by Joanna Burger, Elinor Ostrom, Richard B. Norgaard, David Policansky and Bernard D. Goldstein, Island Press, Washington DC, 2001, ISBN 1-55963-738-2

  • 6.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Business and the state in contemporary Russia2001In: Europe-Asia Studies, ISSN 0966-8136, E-ISSN 1465-3427, Vol. 53, no 8, p. 1255-1256Article, book review (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Review ofPeter Rutland (ed.), Business and the State in Contemporary Russia. Oxford and Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2001

  • 7.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Byutveckling nedifrån: ett byutvecklingsförsök i fyra byar i östra Norrbotten1992Report (Other academic)
  • 8.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Communal land tenure: a mixed bag2006In: Locating the Communal in Asian Land Tenure: European Alliance for Asian Studies (Asia Alliance), Institute of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Humboldt University , 2006Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 9.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Den ryska björnen bör tas på allvar: men hotet låter vänta på sig2001In: Skogseko, ISSN 0346-0495, no 4Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 10.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Framtidsbyar i glesbygden: en implementationsstudie av glesbygdspolitik1992Report (Other academic)
  • 11.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Keeping away from the Leviathan: the case of the swedish forest commons2001Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The role of common property in industrialised society raises a number of questions relevant to constitutional and democratic theory and policy. These questions are discussed here with reference to the current situation of the Swedish Forest Commons. It is shown that commons which have survived for more than one hundred years have difficulties in handling the entrenchment of the principles of liberal democracy, even though their existence is ultimately protected by the liberal democratic state. With reference to Giddens' (1984) theory of structuring and Kiser and Ostrom's (1982) meta-theoretical framework, this article challenges the theory that the constitution forms an institutional hierarchy by restraining collective and operational rules, suggesting rather that lower level rules change and adapt independently. It subsequently tackles the problem of how to identify appropriately the constitution of the commons. Finally it stresses that, despite the fact that the State (the Leviathan [2] ) guarantees the existence of the commons, one of their means of survival is to keep away from the State.

  • 12.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Landstingsföretag - finns dom?: en kartläggning av näringsfrämjande åtgärder inom tre landstingsområden1986Report (Other academic)
  • 13.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Management, resilience and the strategy of the commons1999Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 14.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Managing commons across levels of organizations2003In: Commons Old and New: Proceedings from a workshop on Commons: Old and new / [ed] Erling Berge; Lars Carlsson, CASAS The Centre for Advanced Study of African Society, 2003, p. 29-40Conference paper (Refereed)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 15.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Non-hierarchical evaluation of policy2000In: Evaluation, ISSN 1356-3890, E-ISSN 1461-7153, Vol. 6, no 2, p. 201-216Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    An important task for policy evaluation is to develop methods that are based on the fact that political power is fragmented and that every policy area is complex. This article demonstrates, using an empirical example, how different strands of the policymaking process are related to different logics of evaluation. Also discussed is how these differences may result in quite opposite conclusions about the possible failure or success of single programmes. However, it is concluded that policy research does not have to abandon the idea of rationality and adopt a more postmodern or hermeneutic line of analysis. Policy evaluation is still, it is argued, a matter of finding relevant units of analysis, and in contemporary society these units are networks rather than political-administrative entities. Thus, in order to be able to scrutinize and understand such processes of policy creation, policy evaluation must adopt a non-hierarchical attitude and this requires a bottom-up methodology.

  • 16.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Nonhierarchical implementation analysis: an alternative to the methodological mismatch in policy analysis1996In: Journal of Theoretical Politics, ISSN 0951-6298, E-ISSN 1460-3667, Vol. 8, no 4, p. 527-Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 17.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Policy networks as collective action2000In: Policy Studies Journal, ISSN 0190-292X, E-ISSN 1541-0072, Vol. 28, no 3, p. 502-520Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    An important contribution to the policy sciences, and to interorganizational research in particular, has been the introduction of the so-called policy network approach. Despite the fact that this approach has produced a multitude of concepts, it still lacks a theoretical scaffold. In this article it is argued that simply to refer to something called "network theory" is an unsatisfactory solution. It is suggested that one way of advancing the policy network approach is to apply collective action theory and explicitly regard different empirical appearances of network concepts as expressions of collective action. Six tentative building blocks of such a theory are suggested. it is further argued that the policy network approach would benefit from incorporation into a broader analytical framework such as the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Finally, it is concluded that such an incorporation would advance our ability to understand the processes of policymaking and thus to fulfill one of the old commitments of policy analysis, namely to contribute to the refinement of policy making processes in society.

  • 18.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Policy Science at an Impasse: A Matter of Conceptual Stretching?2017In: Politics and Policy, E-ISSN 1747-1346, Vol. 45, no 2, p. 148-168Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    La ciencia política, particularmente el enfoque de la red de políticas, está experimentando un aumento de nuevos estudios y conceptos. La abundancia del es resultado del ineludiblemente enfoque multidisciplinario de la ciencia política y de nuestra ambición de superar el análisis tradicional de la ciencia política. Sin embargo, los conceptos del campo se están desarrollando con tanta rapidez que el surgimiento de los nuevos híbridos y mutaciones amenazan con confunidr y sobre-complicar en lugar de proporcionarnos claridad, y como consecuencia la mejora acumulativa y el desarrollo de la teoría se ven obstaculizados. Estas consecuencias imprevistas están íntimamente asociadas con errores de estiramiento conceptual, es decir, utilizando conceptos valiosos con un significado claro para referirse a fenómenos inaplicables, haciendo mal uso y disminuyendo el valor de nuestras herramientas conceptuales. En la ciencia política, esto es también el caso de las herramientas analíticas centrales, marcos conceptuales, modelos y teorías. Por lo tanto, aunque la formulación de políticas puede ser desordenada, si esperamos escapar de la supuesta parálisis en la ciencia política, no podemos permitirnos tolerar las inexactitudes actuales del estiramiento conceptual.

  • 19.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Prerequisites for the evolution of markets: an institutional analysis of the Russian forest sector1997In: Dialogue on Sustainable Development of the Russian Forest Sector, Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, IIASA , 1997, p. 143-145Chapter in book (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 20.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Remolding the Russian forest sector1999Conference paper (Other academic)
  • 21.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Review (untitled)2001In: Europe-Asia Studies, ISSN 0966-8136, E-ISSN 1465-3427, Vol. 53, no 8, p. 1255-1256Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Reviewed Work: Business and the State in Contemporary Russia by Peter Rutland.

  • 22. Carlsson, Lars
    Samhällets oregerlighet: organisering och policyproduktion i näringspolitiken1993Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
  • 23.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Scientists, chickens and other practitioners1997In: The Common Property Resource Digest, ISSN 1062-5593, no 41, p. 1-4Article in journal (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 24.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Skogsallmänningarna i Sverige1995Report (Other academic)
  • 25.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Still going strong: community forests in Sweden1999In: Forestry (London), ISSN 0015-752X, E-ISSN 1464-3626, Vol. 72, no 1, p. 11-26Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The Swedish forest commons have survived for more than one hundred years; no deforestation has been observed and the total amount of biomass is increasing. The forests are regarded by experts as well managed both in terms of efficiency and with regard to the preservation of biodiversity. Compared with other types of ownership the commons have a very special organization. The base consists of 25000 shareholders. This is a medieval pattern of ownership that seems to survive; moreover, it seems to be quite prosperous within the realm of modern society with its highly competitive forest industries. Three main explanations are discussed: the commons' conscious attempts to reduce transaction costs, their general inventiveness in adjusting to changed circumstances, and their acclimatization to the logic of the negotiated economy characterized by fuzzy borders between different sectors.

  • 26.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Swedish common forests2001In: Communities and forest management in western Europe: a regional profile of the Working group on community involvement in forest management, Gland, Switzerland: The World Conservation Union , 2001, p. 73-77Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 27.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    The state: inspector, partner och commercial actor?1999In: Circumpolar change: building a future on experiences from the past / [ed] Håkan Myrlund; Lars Carlsson, Luleå tekniska universitet, 1999Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 28.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    The strategy of the commons: history and property rights in forestry in central Sweden2002In: Navigating Social-Ecological Systems, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, p. 116-131Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 29.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    The Swedish common forests: a common property resource in an urban, industrialised society1997Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This paper described the institutional functioning of commonly owned forests in Sweden. A total of 33 common forests were designated in 1861 and have been regulated by the same legislation ever since. Shares in the commons were determined by shares in local arable land and benefits to shareholders have included cash payments, private subsidies and local infrastructure. The common forests have competed successfully in timber production with large-scale timber companies, which the author ascribed to their low transaction costs. They also scored highly on three of five criteria of institutional performance. Overall, their success might be due to their efficient integration into, rather than separation from, the formal economy.

    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 30.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    The Swedish forest commons: challenges for sustainable forestry1998In: Sustainability - the challenge: people, power, and the environment, Montreal: Black Rose Books , 1998, p. 80-89Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 31.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    ‘The Tragedy of the Commons' and Global Environmental Problems2000In: Minerals & Energy - Raw Materials Report, ISSN 1404-1049, E-ISSN 1651-2286, Vol. 15, no 1, p. 41-43Article in journal (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Review of Barkin, J Samuel and George E. Shamaugh (eds.) (1999) Anarchy and the environment. Albany, New York, State University of New York Press. ISBN 0-7914-4183-0

  • 32.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Towards a sustainable Russian forest sector2000In: Natural resources forum (Print), ISSN 0165-0203, E-ISSN 1477-8947, Vol. 24, no 1, p. 31-37Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Russia's forest resources are enormous, but despite almost ten years of transition, problems are still immense, in terms of commercial output and with respect to forest management. This article suggests that one way of changing the situation is to introduce community management of forests. Using the Swedish forest commons as an example, this article argues that such a change in property rights will provide an alternative to massive privatization of the forests and to the undesirable continuation or strengthening of state forest management. Finally, it is concluded that such an introduction of new property rights regimes will not provide the solution to the problems, but rather will contribute to the establishment of a better institutional framework in the Russian forest sector

  • 33.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Berkes, Fikret
    University of Manitoba, Winnipeg.
    Co-management: concepts and methodological implications2005In: Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN 0301-4797, E-ISSN 1095-8630, Vol. 75, no 1, p. 65-76Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Co-management, or the joint management of the commons, is often formulated in terms of some arrangement of power sharing between the State and a community of resource users. In reality, there often are multiple local interests and multiple government agencies at play, and co-management can hardly be understood as the interaction of a unitary State and a homogeneous community. An approach focusing on the legal aspects of co-management, and emphasizing the formal structure of arrangements (how governance is configured) runs the risk of neglecting the functional side of co-management. An alternative approach is to start from the assumption that co-management is a continuous problem-solving process, rather than a fixed state, involving extensive deliberation, negotiation and joint learning within problem-solving networks. This presumption implies that co-management research should preferably focus on how different management tasks are organized and distributed concentrating on the function, rather than the structure, of the system. Such an approach has the effect of highlighting that power sharing is the result, and not the starting point, of the process. This kind of research approach might employ the steps of (1) defining the social-ecological system under focus; (2) mapping the essential management tasks and problems to be solved; (3) clarifying the participants in the problem-solving processes; (4) analyzing linkages in the system, in particular across levels of organization and across geographical space; (5) evaluating capacity-building needs for enhancing the skills and capabilities of people and institutions at various levels; and (6) prescribing ways to improve policy making and problem-solving.

  • 34.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Lazdinis, Marius
    Faculty of Public Management, Law University of Lithuania.
    Institutional frameworks for sustainability?: a comparative analysis of the forest sectors of Russia and the Baltic States2004In: Ambio, ISSN 0044-7447, E-ISSN 1654-7209, Vol. 33, no 6, p. 366-370Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    After the break-up of the Soviet system, the divergence in forest management among Soviet republics became obvious. While the forest sectors of the Baltic States have been fundamentally changed, Russia has not been able to develop an institutional framework that would fit the prerequisites for social-ecological resilience. It is argued that sustainable development requires institutional frameworks that have the capacity to adapt and learn, and thus to treat policies as experiments that are constantly assessed and readjusted. This, however, requires a participatory approach and in this respect the Baltic States are believed to be on a more promising track. Finally, it is concluded that only to the extent that suitable institutional frameworks will be developed will social-ecological resilience be a significant feature of the natural resources management in the former communist countries.

    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 35.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Lundgren, Nils-Gustav
    Den ryska skogssektorn: på väg mot marknadsekonomi?2002In: Människor, hälsa, miljö: föredrag hållna på filosofiska fakultetens dag 6 oktober 2001, Luleå tekniska universitet, 2002, p. 5-17Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 36.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Lundgren, Nils-Gustav
    Olsson, Mats-Olov
    Forest enterprises in transition: business behavior in the Tomsk forest sector1999Report (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 37.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Lundgren, Nils-Gustav
    Olsson, Mats-Olov
    The Russian detour: real transition in a virtual economy?2001In: Europe-Asia Studies, ISSN 0966-8136, E-ISSN 1465-3427, Vol. 53, no 6, p. 841-867Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Illustrates the creation of a market economy by showing that no easy procedures automatically lead to that goal; the Russian forest sector is used as a model for all Russian industries. The major obstacle for the forest sector is the existing institutional framework consisting of both formal & informal rules. In Russia, the institutional system adversely affects the new & more market-oriented institutions. Indeed, multiple problems undermine the Russian forest industry. Laws are often ignored, property rights are ill defined, the market does not always determine value, & authorities often fail to prosecute violations of laws. Through a comparative study of the Russian & Swedish forest industries the authors reveal that Russian firms lack funding & bank support, they are more burdened by taxes, & trading is marred by contract violations. Further complicating the issue is Russia's overlapping jurisdictions; the forest sector is regulated by three levels of rules. Consequently, the problems must be solved at three different levels

    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 38.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Lundgren, Nils-Gustav
    Olsson, Mats-Olov
    Why is the Russian bear still asleep after ten years in transition?2000Report (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 39.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Lundgren, Nils-Gustav
    Olsson, Mats-Olov
    Varakin, Mikhail Yu.
    Institutions and the emergence of markets: transitions in the Arkhangelsk forest sector1999Report (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 40.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Lundgren, Nils-Gustav
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Sandström, Annica
    Universitetens roll i Forskarstation Östra Norrbotten: delrapport2003Report (Other academic)
  • 41.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Myrlund, HåkanLuleå tekniska universitet.
    Circumpolar change: building a future on experiences from the past : proceeding, the Fifth Circumpolar Universities Cooperation Conference, June 10-12 1997, Luleå, Sweden1999Collection (editor) (Other academic)
  • 42.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Myrlund, Håkan
    Luleå tekniska universitet.
    Sjukhuset "mitt emellan": den politiska processen bakom lokaliseringen av Sunderby sjukhus1999Report (Other academic)
  • 43.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Olsson, Mats-Olov
    Institutions and the emergence of markets: transition in the Tomsk forest sector1998Report (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 44.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Olsson, Mats-Olov
    Policyövningar med ryska skogsintressenter2001In: IIASA-nytt, no 34, p. 8-10Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 45.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Olsson, Mats-Olov
    Lundgren, Nils-Gustav
    If money only grew on trees: the Russian forest sector in transition2000In: Forestry Chronicle, ISSN 0015-7546, Vol. 76, no 4, p. 605-610Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 46.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Sandström, Annica
    Network governance of the commons2006In: IASCP 2006 Conference Papers, 2006Conference paper (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The survival of the commons is closely associated with the potential to find ways to strengthen contemporary management systems, making them more responsive to a number of complexities, like the dynamics of ecosystems and related, but often fragmented, institutions. A discussion on the desirability of finding ways to establish socalled cross-scale linkages, i.e. connections among different actors from different levels, i.e. connections among different actors from different levels of organisation and geographical settings, recently has been vitalised in the literature. The establishment of such linkages is believed to have many advantages for the sustainable management of the commons. In the same vein, concepts like adaptive management, comanagement and adaptive co-management have been discussed. In essence, these ways of organizing management to generate alternative governance systems are more closely related to network governance and social network theory, than to political administrative hierarchy. However, so far, attempts to incorporate social network analysis (SNA) in this literature have been rather few, and not particularly elaborate. In this paper, a framework for such an approach will be presented. The framework provides an analytical skeleton for the understanding of joint management and the establishment of cross-scale linkages. The relationships between structural network properties - like density, centrality and heterogeneity, and innovation in adaptive co-management systems - are highlighted as major features of high functioning management systems. The paper makes a theoretical and methodological contribution to the understanding of co-management, and thereby to the survival of the commons.

    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 47.
    Carlsson, Lars
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Sandström, Annica
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Network governance of the commons2008In: International Journal of the Commons, ISSN 1875-0281, E-ISSN 1875-0281, Vol. 2, no 1, p. 33-54Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    The survival of the commons is closely associated with the potential to find ways to strengthen contemporary management systems, making them more responsive to a number of complexities, like the dynamics of ecosystems and related, but often fragmented, institutions. A discussion on the desirability of finding ways to establish so-called cross-scale linkages has recently been vitalised in the literature. In the same vein, concepts like adaptive management, co-management and adaptive co-management have been discussed. In essence, these ways of organizing management incorporate an implicit assumption about the establishment of social networks and is more closely related to network governance and social network theory, than to political administrative hierarchy. However, so far, attempts to incorporate social network analysis (SNA) in this literature have been rather few, and not particularly elaborate. In this paper, a framework for such an approach will be presented. The framework provides an analytical skeleton for the understanding of joint management and the establishment of cross-scale linkages. The relationships between structural network properties - like density, centrality and heterogeneity - and innovation in adaptive co-management systems are highlighted as important to consider when crafting institutions for natural resource management. The paper makes a theoretical and methodological contribution to the understanding of co-management, and thereby to the survival of the commons.

    Download full text (pdf)
    fulltext
  • 48. Dolsak, Nives
    et al.
    Brondizio, Eduardo S.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Cash, David W.
    Gibson, Clark C.
    Hoffman, Mattew J.
    Knox, Anna
    Mienzen-Dick, Ruth
    Ostrom, Elinor
    Adaptation to challenges2003In: The commons in the new millennium: challenges and adaptation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003, p. 527-557Chapter in book (Other academic)
  • 49. Efremov, Dmitry F.
    et al.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Olsson, Mats-Olov
    Sheingauz, Alexander S.
    Institutional change and transition in the forest sector of Khabarovsk Krai1999Report (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
  • 50. Kleinhof, Andris
    et al.
    Carlsson, Lars
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Olsson, Mats-Olov
    The forest sector in Moscow oblast1999Report (Other academic)
    Download full text (pdf)
    FULLTEXT01
12 1 - 50 of 57
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf