Change search
Refine search result
1 - 37 of 37
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Luciani, Andrea
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Norrbotten's Technological Megasystem as a heritage discourse: paradoxes and controversies2019In: / [ed] Maria Alessandra Segantini, London, 2019, Vol. 2, no 15, p. 292-300Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 2.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Att flytta en mönsterstad2015In: Fabrik & Bolig, ISSN 0106-3324, Vol. 2015, p. 24-43Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 3. Sjöholm, Jennie
    Att återanvända en stad2010In: Byggnadskultur, ISSN 0348-6885, Vol. 2010, no 3, p. 36-39Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 4.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Authenticity and relocation of built heritage: the urban transformation of Kiruna, Sweden2017In: Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, ISSN 2044-1266, E-ISSN 2044-1274, Vol. 7, no 2, p. 110-128Article in journal (Refereed)
    Abstract [en]

    Purpose –This article investigates how different notions about the conservation of builtheritage develop in a situation of structural change that demands either the demolition orrelocation of a large number of historic buildings.Design/methodology/approach – The analysis is based on a case study of the on-going urbantransformation of the Swedish mining town Kiruna. The investigation was based on the textanalysis of urban planning documents and media reporting, which was used to distinguishstakeholders’ positions towards conservation based on authenticity aspects.Findings – The conservation goals of the urban planning process are unclear and thestakeholders have conceptually different views regarding which parts of the town’s builtheritage are of significance, which negatively affects the ability to make well informed,transparent and intelligible management decisions. Stakeholder views on the management ofbuilt heritage span from the relocation of a few, single historic buildings to maintaining theintegrity of the town as a heritage site by moving a significant number of buildings.Research limitations/implications – The Kiruna case, being exceptional because conservationin situ is impossible, has the potential to highlight the relation between single historic buildingsand the integrity of an urban heritage site, as well as implications for conservation on theurban scale.Originality/value – This investigation contributes to knowledge of built heritage in situationsof structural change, which is of concern for planning and conservation practice. Currently,many urban areas are under pressure of transformations or destruction

  • 5. Sjöholm, Jennie
    Brytpunkt Kiruna2008In: Byggnadskultur, ISSN 0348-6885, Vol. 2008, no 1, p. 46-49Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 6.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Built cultural heritage in an urban planning context: Literature review2013Report (Other academic)
  • 7.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    De-heritagisation in urban planning: a study of Kiruna's urban transformation2013Conference paper (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    A major urban transformation is taking place in Kiruna, a mining town in the northernmost part of Sweden; the iron ore mine extends beneath the settlement and the mining activity will cause severe subsidence the coming decades. This will affect the town's built cultural heritage. Kiruna´s built cultural heritage is well established since the 1980´s, and a considerable part of it is ‘official heritage’, where buildings as well as built-up areas are protected by both local and national legislation. Conservation of the built cultural heritage involves challenges to the urban planning practice due to the extensive urban transformation. This paper presents an on-going case study that analyses the valuation and management of Kiruna´s built cultural heritage in the contemporary urban transformation process. The empiric material primarily consists of planning documents and media coverage. The meaning of the built cultural heritage to different stakeholders is interpreted through discourse analysis; there is a heritagisation process in which certain aspects of the built environments history becomes significant in the present due to cultural and social processes. In Kiruna there is a strong ‘authorised heritage discourse’ in which particularly older wooden buildings, associated with the town´s mining history, is reinforced as cultural heritage in the contemporary planning process. However, it is also possible to identify a de-heritagisation process in which the historic values of the ‘official heritage’ is diminished, and attributes in listed buildings being formulated as a liability to a sustainable urban transformation. There is a tendency that the built cultural heritage is managed as fixed and static entities in the urban planning, rather than as a dynamic, socially and culturally constructed phenomenon. In order to address the variety and diversity of values and meanings related to the built environment, planning methods need to be developed in order to make conscious and pertinent urban planning decisions.

  • 8. Sjöholm, Jennie
    Ett industriarv i tiden: Norrbottens teknologiska megasystem2002In: Norrbotten: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförenings tidskrift, Luleå, 2002, p. 102-108Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 9. Sjöholm, Jennie
    Föreställningar om stadsomvandlingens Kiruna2010Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    The city of Kiruna is about to transform, due to the expansion of the iron ore mine that is dominating the city’s labour market. The built environment is at the same time a cultural heritage of national interest. The purpose of this paper is to examine which images of the city that become important due to the city transformation. This is accomplished by a textual criticism of three different sources; newspaper articles, the municipality’s plans and documents, together with a survey made at the local high school. Places mentioned in the source material have been mapped, and then interpreted as being imaginary geographies of the images of Kiruna. Three strong images have been identified. These are Kiruna as the Mining City, as the Ideal City, and as the City That Will Move. Different sets of places are connected to each image. Apart from these places, there are an other kind of places, important to the everyday life in Kiruna. All together, these places constitutes Kiruna. However, in the paper they are explained as being different means of the production of space. Using Henri Lefebvres terms, the images are an example of representational spaces, while the everyday life is a spatial practice. This helps explaining why the built environment is perceived in different ways, and why certain places are looked upon as cultural heritage.

  • 10.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Förord2012In: Kirunakåkar, Kiruna: J Vajstedt, L Kejonen , 2012Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 11.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Gruvnäringen brukar och förbrukar2011In: Samdok-forum, Vol. 2011, no 2, p. 28-29Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 12.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Heritagisation of built environments: a study of the urban transformation in Kiruna, Sweden2013Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This licentiate thesis is part of a larger case study that examines the built cultural heritage in Kiruna’s urban transformation. The research study presupposes it is necessary to address cultural significance of the built environment in urban planning practice. In Sweden, a conservation planning strategy emerged during the 1980s, in response to the extensive urban renewals that took place in many towns over the decades before. In spite of this, there are many examples of how demands for urban renewal challenge urban conservation.The aim of the thesis is to explore how the concept of built cultural heritage is understood in contemporary urban planning and how urban planning practice affects the built cultural heritage. The main research question is: how are buildings and built environments transformed into cultural heritage?The analysis draws on concepts such as ‘heritagisation’, ‘heritage’ and ‘authorised heritage discourse’. Heritagisation is defined as a process in which something, such as a built environment, turns into heritage. Heritage is perceived as a social and cultural construction in which values and meanings are attributed to, for instance, built environments. There is a distinction between official heritage that is authorised by legislation and unofficial heritage, which is not formally recognised. The authorised heritage discourse is characterised as a hegemonic heritage discourse favouring the monumental and aesthetically appealing, being a concern for heritage specialists.The research is performed as a qualitative, interpretative intrinsic case study of Kiruna’s contemporary urban transformation. The case study is triangulated using multiple methods and a variety of data. The main methods used are text analysis of records, planning documents and media coverage as well as semistructured interviews and observations.Kiruna was established in 1900, with the mining company LKAB as the main stakeholder, in order to provide housing for the large number of workers required in the iron ore industry. The hopes were very high for the design of the new town and some of Sweden’s most famous architects, planners and artists at the time were hired. From the 1980s until 2005, the town’s built environments were recognised as built cultural heritage. Local, regional and national authorities collaborated in protecting designated buildings. In 2004, it became publicly known that subsidence caused by mining activities would affect the settlement; the town would, therefore, be relocated. This has caused controversies around the management of the built cultural heritage in the urban transformation processes. The case of Kiruna illustrates the impact of legislation in defining built cultural heritage and the influence of the authorised heritage discourse on urban planning practice. There are, however, difficulties in implementing the notion of cultural heritage as socially and culturally constructed into urban planning processes; rather, the heritage is perceived as a fixed entity. It is suggested that also unofficial heritage should be recognised in the urban planning processes, in order to manage the long-term urban transformation process.

  • 13.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Heritagisation, re-heritagisation and de-heritagisation of built environments: The urban transformation of Kiruna, Sweden2016Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    This doctoral thesis presents research that aimed to contribute to the understanding of heritagisation in built environments and how heritagisation interacts with structural changes to an environment. The theoretical framework of the research was based on heritagisation, a concept defined by Harrison (2013) as the process through which objects, places and practices are turned into cultural heritage. The research was part of a single case study investigating conceptualisations of built heritage during the urban transformation of the town of Kiruna. Kiruna is a mining town in the northernmost part of Sweden that has plans to be relocated so that the mining company LKAB can continue mining the iron ore deposit that extends underneath the settlement. Kiruna is also a designated heritage site since the 1980s, and includes a large number of protected buildings. Hence, it is of interest how the built heritage is managed during the urban planning process. This is not only because the urban planning situation, which includes the relocation of an entire town, is special, but also because the town’s built heritage inevitably will change during the urban transformation. The research underlying this thesis has followed heritagisation during the urban transformation, from 2004, when the urban transformation was announced, until 2015. The empirical data used consist of planning documents, media reporting and observations, which together provide an overall view of the public discussions over the course of the urban planning process. Findings from the Kiruna case study show that the town’s officially recognised built heritage corresponds with the concept of an authorised heritage discourse (AHD). This heritage discourse was challenged by the urban transformation. Conservation goals are not clearly stated in the urban planning process and there are differing ideas for how to manage historic buildings during the urban transformation. These ideas shift both over time and between stakeholders, and the outcome of the urban planning process depends on a balance between the discourses of heritage conservation, urban development and architectural production. During the urban planning process some parts of the town’s official heritage have been reaffirmed as built heritage, while others have been dismissed. The concept of heritagisation was adopted and developed throughout the research presented in this thesis. This research also introduced the concepts of re-heritagisation and de-heritagisation, which refer to new heritagisation processes that occur when built heritage is contested and challenged during urban change. One of the main conclusions of the research was that the changes in meaning during the heritagisation process can be divided into four dimensions to analyse the complicated relationship between different interests and strategies in urban planning. Heritagisation can refer to: the addition of new heritage; reaffirmation of already designated heritage; re-interpretation of already designated heritage; rejection of previous designated heritage.

  • 14.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Jävre turiststation: Från rivningsobjekt till byggnadsminne2011In: Norrbotten: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförenings tidskrift, Luleå: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförening , 2011, p. 128-137Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 15. Sjöholm, Jennie
    Jävre turiststation: På rätt sida vägen?2010In: Byggnadskultur, ISSN 0348-6885, Vol. 2010, no 2, p. 16-19Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 16.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Kirunas stadsomvandling: Omdaning av en mönsterstad2014In: Plan (Stockholm, 1947), ISSN 0032-0560, no 1, p. 27-31Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 17.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Kulturarv i norr: kyrkstäder2014In: Byggnadskultur, ISSN 0348-6885, Vol. 2014, no 4, p. 19-21Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 18.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Kulturvärden i vardagsmiljön: Matojärvi islada, Kiruna2013In: Norrbotten: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförenings tidskrift, Luleå: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförening , 2013, p. 214-219Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 19. Sjöholm, Jennie
    Malmberget och Kiruna: Lika men olika2010In: Norrbotten: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförenings tidskrift, Luleå: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförening , 2010, p. 102-115Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 20. Sjöholm, Jennie
    Modern arkitektur i Norrbotten2010In: Norrbotten: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförenings tidskrift, Luleå: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförening , 2010, p. 180-187Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 21.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Norrbotten's Technological Megasystem2019In: TICCIH Bulletin, ISSN 1605-6647, Vol. 85, p. 3-6Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 22.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Norrbottens technologisches Megasystem2019In: Industriekultur, ISSN 0949-3751, Vol. 86, no 1, p. 27-29Article in journal (Other academic)
  • 23.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Omvärdering av kulturarv: Gruvstaden Kiruna i förändring2019In: Tidsskrift for kulturforskning, ISSN 1502-7473, E-ISSN 2387-6727Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 24.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Re-heritagisation within planning practice2016In: Planning practice + research, ISSN 0269-7459, E-ISSN 1360-0583Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 25. Sjöholm, Jennie
    Restaurering pågår2007In: Norrbotten: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförenings tidskrift, Luleå: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförening , 2007, p. 118-127Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 26.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Restaureringen av Sikfors gamla kraftstation2012In: Årsbok: Piteå museum, Piteå: Piteå museum , 2012, p. 40-49Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 27.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    The town reassembled: authenticity and transformation in Kiruna, Sweden2018In: Authentic Reconstruction: Authenticity, Architecture and the Built Heritage / [ed] John Bold, Peter Larkham, Robert Pickard, New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018, 1, p. 237-252Chapter in book (Refereed)
  • 28. Sjöholm, Jennie
    Vad är Kiruna värt?2007In: Norrbotten: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförenings tidskrift, Luleå: Norrbottens läns hembygdsförening , 2007, p. 142-162Chapter in book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 29. Sjöholm, Jennie
    Vad är Kiruna värt?: Kiruna - en kulturvärderingsanalys2008Book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 30.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Hidman, Erik
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Att flytta en stad: Gamla och nya Kiruna2016In: Byggnadskultur, ISSN 0348-6885, Vol. 2016, no 3, p. 18-21Article in journal (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 31.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Hidman, Erik
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Town identity, urban form and urban transformation: The case of Kiruna, Sweden2017Conference paper (Refereed)
  • 32.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Hidman, Erik
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Urban conservation and urban morphology in Kiruna, SwedenIn: Urban morphology, ISSN 1027-4278Article in journal (Refereed)
  • 33. Sjöholm, Jennie
    et al.
    Karlsson, Lina
    Vilka hus! Vilka hus?: Modern arkitektur i Norrbotten2007Book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 34.
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Nilsson, Kristina L.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Malmfältens kulturmiljöprocesser2011Report (Other academic)
  • 35.
    Wiklund, Roine
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Brunnström, Lasse
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Boken om LKAB: Den svenske nasjonalformuen2015Book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 36.
    Wiklund, Roine
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Brunnström, Lasse
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Feldman, Margarita
    Boken om LKAB: den svenska nationalrikedomen2015Book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
  • 37.
    Wiklund, Roine
    et al.
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Social Sciences.
    Brunnström, Lasse
    Sjöholm, Jennie
    Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.
    Feldman, Margarita
    The book of LKAB: The national treasure of Sweden2015Book (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.))
1 - 37 of 37
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf