Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Publications (2 of 2) Show all publications
McGawley, K., Juudas, E., Kazior, Z., Ström, K., Blomstrand, E., Hansson, O. & Holmberg, H.-C. (2017). No additional benefits of block-over evenly-distributed high-intensity interval training within a polarized microcycle. Frontiers in Physiology, 8(JUN), 1-12, Article ID 413.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>No additional benefits of block-over evenly-distributed high-intensity interval training within a polarized microcycle
Show others...
2017 (English)In: Frontiers in Physiology, E-ISSN 1664-042X, Vol. 8, no JUN, p. 1-12, article id 413Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: The current study aimed to investigate the responses to block- versus evenly-distributed high-intensity interval training (HIT) within a polarized microcycle. Methods: Twenty well-trained junior cross-country skiers (10 males, age 17.6 ± 1.5 and 10 females, age 17.3 ± 1.5) completed two, 3-week periods of training (EVEN and BLOCK) in a randomized, crossover-design study. In EVEN, 3 HIT sessions (5 × 4-min of diagonal-stride roller-skiing) were completed at a maximal sustainable intensity each week while low-intensity training (LIT) was distributed evenly around the HIT. In BLOCK, the same 9 HIT sessions were completed in the second week while only LIT was completed in the first and third weeks. Heart rate (HR), session ratings of perceived exertion (sRPE), and perceived recovery (pREC) were recorded for all HIT and LIT sessions, while distance covered was recorded for each HIT interval. The recovery-stress questionnaire for athletes (RESTQ-Sport) was completed weekly. Before and after EVEN and BLOCK, resting saliva and muscle samples were collected and an incremental test and 600-m time-trial (TT) were completed. Results: Pre- to post-testing revealed no significant differences between EVEN and BLOCK for changes in resting salivary cortisol, testosterone, or IgA, or for changes in muscle capillary density, fiber area, fiber composition, enzyme activity (CS, HAD, and PFK) or the protein content of VEGF or PGC-1α. Neither were any differences observed in the changes in skiing economy, VO2max or 600-m time-trial performance between interventions. These findings were coupled with no significant differences between EVEN and BLOCK for distance covered during HIT, summated HR zone scores, total sRPE training load, overall pREC or overall recovery-stress state. However, 600-m TT performance improved from pre- to post-training, irrespective of intervention (P = 0.003), and a number of hormonal and muscle biopsy markers were also significantly altered post-training (P < 0.05). Discussion: The current study shows that well-trained junior cross-country skiers are able to complete 9 HIT sessions within 1 week without compromising total work done and without experiencing greater stress or reduced recovery over a 3-week polarized microcycle. However, the findings do not support block-distributed HIT as a superior method to a more even distribution of HIT in terms of enhancing physiological or performance adaptions.

Keywords
cross-country skiing, endurance, junior athletes, muscle, periodization, recovery, stress, training load
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-84508 (URN)10.3389/fphys.2017.00413 (DOI)000403515100001 ()28659826 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-85020780112 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2021-05-19 Created: 2021-05-19 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved
McGawley, K. & Holmberg, H.-C. (2014). Aerobic and anaerobic contributions to energy production among junior male and female cross-country skiers during diagonal skiing. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 9(1), 32-40
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Aerobic and anaerobic contributions to energy production among junior male and female cross-country skiers during diagonal skiing
2014 (English)In: International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, ISSN 1555-0265, E-ISSN 1555-0273, Vol. 9, no 1, p. 32-40Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: Cross-country-ski races place complex demands on athletes, with events lasting between approximately 3 min and 2 h. The aim of the current study was to compare the aerobic and anaerobic measures derived from a short time trial (TT) between male and female skiers using diagonal cross-country skiing. Methods: Twenty-four highly trained cross-country skiers (12 male and 12 female, age 17.4 ± 1.4 y, body mass 68.2 ± 8.9 kg, height 174 ± 8 cm) participated. The submaximal VO2–speed relationship and VO2max were derived from an incremental ramp test to exhaustion (RAMP), while the accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD), peak VO2, and performance time were measured during a 600-m TT. Results: The female skiers took longer to complete the TT than the males (209 ± 9 s vs 166 ± 7 s, P < .001) and exhibited a lower relative anaerobic contribution (20% ± 4% vs 24% ± 3%, P = .015) and a higher fractional utilization of VO2max (84% ± 4% vs 79% ± 5%, P = .007) than males. Although there was no significant difference in AOD between the sexes (40.9 ± 9.5 and 47.3 ± 7.4 mL/kg for females and males, respectively; P = .079), the mean difference ± 90% confidence intervals of 6.4 ± 6.0 mL/kg reflected a likely practical difference (ES = 0.72). The peak VO2 during the TT was significantly higher than VO2max during the RAMP for all participants combined (62.3 ± 6.8 vs 60.5 ± 7.2 mL/kg/min, P = .011), and the mean difference ± 90% confidence intervals of 1.8 ± 1.1 mL/kg reflected a possible practical difference (ES = 0.25). Conclusions: These results show that performance and physiological responses to a self-paced TT lasting approximately 3 min differ between sexes. In addition, a TT may provide a valid measure of VO2max.

Keywords
accumulated oxygen deficit, incremental ramp test, sex differences, maximal oxygen uptake, time trial
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-84345 (URN)10.1123/IJSPP.2013-0239 (DOI)000333364200007 ()24088732 (PubMedID)2-s2.0-84892918288 (Scopus ID)
Available from: 2013-11-26 Created: 2021-05-19 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0002-1273-6061

Search in DiVA

Show all publications