Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Continuous Change Through Professionalization: Fragmentation, Digitalization and Sustainabilization in Construction from the Perspective of Swedish Architects
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Industrilized and sustainable construction.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1168-8096
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In this thesis I discuss how change in the construction sector affects and is affected by individuals’ perceptions and actions. Previous research has shown that behavioral change at the individual level is needed to achieve change at the macro level. This thesis therefore highlights continuous change from a professional perspective. Specifically, it focuses on the change phenomena of fragmentation, digitalization, and sustainabilization,and is thus connected to ongoing debates in research on how to ‘manage fragmentation’ or ‘achieve digitalization and sustainability’. Some previous studies in these areas rely on assumptions that are problematized and presented in a new light in this thesis. By focusing on professionalization, the thesis unveils the complex and reciprocal relationship between these change phenomena. Previous research has rarely analyzed fragmentation, digitalization, and sustainabilization together, especially from a professionalization perspective. The thesis therefore fills a research gap while simultaneously addressing highly relevant issues that are discussed daily at individual, organizational, and sectoral levels.The thesis focuses particularly on the architectural profession. This is partly because increasing fragmentation has significantly altered the role of architects in construction projects, not least because they are seen as central actors in driving digitalization and sustainability efforts. However, the focus on architects is also motivated by their under-representation in existing research. The theoretical points of departure are institutional theory (with a focus on agency) as well as sociological concepts related to professional identity and professional roles.Methodologically, the thesis builds on interpretive qualitative studies at the individual level, where focus groups, interviews, and shadowing have been used. In total, 41 architects participated in these studies, sharing their perceptions of themselves and their everyday practices in construction projects.By focusing on the professionalization underpinning larger structural changes—fragmentation, digitalization, and the sustainability transition—the thesis explores new perspectives. It discusses: the nature of fragmentation (from static to dynamic); the impact of fragmentation on digital and sustainability change (from barrier to enabler); how fragmentation can be managed (from the architect’s perspective); professional roles (from fixed to flexible); the profession (from uniformity to diversity); agency (from “cultural dopes” via entrepreneurs to implicit agents); professional identity (from partly unexplored to a central source of institutional change); as well as how digitalization and the sustainability transition can be understood as institutional movements.The thesis contributes empirically to theoretical fields such as research on professions and institutional theory (especially concerning agency and institutional work). It also offers new perspectives on long-standing challenges within construction research. For example, the results show the significance of professional identity for achieving institutional change in the construction sector, as well as how professionals cope with, navigate, and adapt to continuous change—insights that are central for understanding and practically managing fragmentation.Finally, with this thesis I hope to contribute to a renewed discussion about the development and future of the architectural profession, as well as the need to consider individual experiences to understand larger structural phenomena.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2025.
Series
Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → …, ISSN 1402-1544
Keywords [en]
Institutional Change, Professionals, Fragmentation, Digitalization, Sustainability, Role, Identity, Interpretation, Architect, Construction
National Category
Sociology (Excluding Social Work, Social Anthropology, Demography and Criminology) Architectural Engineering Work Sciences Construction Management
Research subject
Construction Management and Building Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-115407ISBN: 978-91-8048-947-8 (print)ISBN: 978-91-8048-948-5 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-115407DiVA, id: diva2:2013982
Public defence
2026-01-19, A109, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-11-17 Created: 2025-11-14 Last updated: 2025-12-08Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Architects coping with continuous fragmentation
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Architects coping with continuous fragmentation
2025 (English)In: Architectural Engineering and Design Management, ISSN 1745-2007, E-ISSN 1752-7589, Vol. 21, no 1, p. 1-16Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

‘Fragmentation’ is a word often used to characterize the construction industry. Fragmentation can adversely impact project outcomes, hinder the adoption of innovative technologies, and obstruct the transition toward sustainable practices. It has also been viewed as a cause of significant changes in the architect’s profession. Yet no research has studied fragmentation from a profession-perspective, specifically a profession with early participation in building projects. With interpretative methods and drawing from sociological concepts, we aim to understand how architects perceive their professional role, and analyze this alongside fragmentation to answer the question: how are architects coping with the effects of fragmentation? The study consists of 23 focus group sessions, where architects constituted the core and other actors participated occasionally, and five deep interviews with architects. Our first contribution shows how architects are coping with fragmentation through a dynamic social process, making small adjustments in role adaptation to maintain their professional identity, and how this way of coping with fragmentation can actually contribute to continuous fragmentation. Secondly, our study challenges earlier suggested solutions for handling fragmentation by showing how they simply cause fragmentation earlier in the design phase. The implications of ‘design fragmentation’ for the professional architect and the outcome of a building project are discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2025
Keywords
Architect, profession, fragmentation, design management, socialization
National Category
Other Civil Engineering
Research subject
Construction Management and Building Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-110012 (URN)10.1080/17452007.2024.2400156 (DOI)001308172500001 ()2-s2.0-105001936341 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Vinnova
Note

Validerad;2025;Nivå 2;2025-03-12 (u2);

Full text license: CC BY;

Available from: 2024-09-17 Created: 2024-09-17 Last updated: 2026-01-23Bibliographically approved
2. Professionals navigating continuous movements: interpreting architects’ agency and legitimization of BIM and reuse roles
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Professionals navigating continuous movements: interpreting architects’ agency and legitimization of BIM and reuse roles
2025 (English)In: Architectural Engineering and Design Management, ISSN 1745-2007, E-ISSN 1752-7589Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

While technological advancements in BIM and material reuse have been widely studied, less attention has been given to the behavioral and cultural shifts necessary for their successful implementation. Architectural professionals are expected to acquire new skills and redefine their roles to align with these trends. Yet, little is known about how architects perceive and navigate these institutional changes. Using a multi-levelled institutional lens, the research presented in this paper addresses this gap by exploring how architects perceive and navigate their institutional context, including the movements (digitalization and sustainabilization), and legitimize their purposive actions in adapting their professional roles toward BIM and reuse. Through reflections from 15 architects (with seven narratives in particular focus), the study unpacks perceptions of legitimacy and how these influence professional behavior and decision-making. An intertextual narrative analysis reveals how the motivation to adopt BIM and reuse is closely linked to maintaining the stability of the professional institution. The findings show how changes related to BIM and reuse may conflict with professionals’ values and self-perceptions, affecting the potential for expected advancements in digitalization and sustainability. This study enhances the understanding of micro-level processes driving institutional change in the construction industry by uncovering underlying motives and intentions behind architects’ actions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2025
Keywords
Institutional change, profession, architect, role, legitimacy, agency, digitalization, sustainabilization, BIM, reuse
National Category
Architectural Engineering
Research subject
Construction Management and Building Technology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-112178 (URN)10.1080/17452007.2025.2480836 (DOI)001449037500001 ()2-s2.0-105000548915 (Scopus ID)
Note

Full text license: CC BY 4.0;

Available from: 2025-03-31 Created: 2025-03-31 Last updated: 2025-11-18

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2207 kB)82 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT03.pdfFile size 2207 kBChecksum SHA-512
8e63d910e5439e16f83cb021746694d737f0450758c29773246437eedb3a7b185602bdc22e4a5cb3b7b5139fa09eb9e6af31137df16f5474a4ec86d22118e5ef
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
The full text will be freely available from 2027-06-08 12:00
Available from 2027-06-08 12:00

Authority records

Norell, Mathilda

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Norell, Mathilda
By organisation
Industrilized and sustainable construction
Sociology (Excluding Social Work, Social Anthropology, Demography and Criminology)Architectural EngineeringWork SciencesConstruction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 82 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 2096 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf