Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Face validation of database forensic investigation metamodel
Faculty of Engineering, School of Computing, Computer Science Department, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia; Computer Science Department, Aden Community College, Aden 999101, Yemen.
Faculty of Engineering, School of Computing, Computer Science Department, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Skudai 81310, Johor, Malaysia.
Department of Cybersecurity and Networking, School of Information Technology, Community College Qatar, Doha 7344, Qatar.
Luleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för system- och rymdteknik, Digitala tjänster och system. Department of Computer Science and Media Technology Department, Malmö Universitet, Nordenskiöldsgatan 1, 21119 Malmö, Sweden.ORCID-id: 0000-0003-4071-4596
Vise andre og tillknytning
2021 (engelsk)Inngår i: Infrastructures, E-ISSN 2412-3811, Vol. 6, nr 2, s. 1-19Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Using a face validity approach, this paper provides a validation of the Database Forensic Investigation Metamodel (DBFIM). The DBFIM was developed to solve interoperability, heterogeneity, complexity, and ambiguity in the database forensic investigation (DBFI) field, where several models were identified, collected, and reviewed to develop DBFIM. However, the developed DBFIM lacked the face validity-based approach that could ensure DBFIM’s applicability in the DBFI field. The completeness, usefulness, and logic of the developed DBFIM needed to be validated by experts. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to perform the validation of the developed DBFIM using the qualitative face validity approach. The face validity method is a common way of validating metamodels through subject expert inquiry on the domain application of the metamodel to assess whether the metamodel is reasonable and compatible based on the outcomes. For this purpose, six experts were nominated and selected to validate the developed DBFIM. From the expert review, the developed DBFIM was found to be complete, coherent, logical, scalable, interoperable, and useful for the DBFI field.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
MDPI, 2021. Vol. 6, nr 2, s. 1-19
Emneord [en]
database forensics, digital forensic, face validity, metamodel, validation
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Informationssystem
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-82947DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures6020013ISI: 000623662600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85100332066OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-82947DiVA, id: diva2:1528437
Merknad

Validerad;2021;Nivå 1;2021-02-15 (johcin)

Tilgjengelig fra: 2021-02-15 Laget: 2021-02-15 Sist oppdatert: 2025-10-21bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Person

Kebande, Victor R.

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Kebande, Victor R.
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 263 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf