Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Performance of Excavated Sulfur-Rich Soil Stabilized with Binder: A Field Study of Mixing Efficiency
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Mining and Geotechnical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9688-9614
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Mining and Geotechnical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7585-4017
Ecoloop, Stockholm, Sweden.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Mining and Geotechnical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2631-3502
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: Advances in Civil Engineering / Hindawi, ISSN 1687-8086, E-ISSN 1687-8094, article id 5446332Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this study, a mixing procedure of sulfur-rich soil and cement-based binder to enhance the soil’s unconfined compressive strength (UCS) was tested in field conditions for geotechnical applications. The focus was to evaluate uniformity of industrial size soil-binder mixture, blended by existing method. This paper outlined sampling strategy and the number of samples needed for a valid uniformity evaluation. Moreover, this study emphasized the difference between field mixing and laboratory mixture preparation by comparing UCS of stabilized soil samples in the field and UCS of corresponding samples mixed and prepared in the laboratory environment. In the field, soil and cement were blended in two to four stages with 5% and 7% cement—the percentages being based on the soil’s dry weight under field conditions. Samples were taken from the field mixtures after each stage. Since the number of samples needed to be representative of mixture characteristics for large-scale mixing is not standardized, this field experiment included two phases. The first phase was dedicated to finding a sampling strategy for a large soil pile along with measuring UCS of collected samples. In the second phase, sample collection was conducted based on the results of sampling strategy from the first phase. In the laboratory, samples with percentages of binder similar to the amount of binder in the field were also prepared. Both field and laboratory samples were prepared using the tapping method in the laboratory for UCS test. Samples were cured under similar conditions for 28 days. The results showed that the uniformity of mixture improved after each additional mixing stage. In addition, while spots with low UCS were observed in the second mixing step, these spots were eliminated in the third mixing step, and results of the UCS tests were comparatively uniform. Moreover, comparison of the samples revealed that the UCS of the laboratory mixture is higher than that of the field mixture. This showed that even though the UCS is a good standard for comparing the strength of different soils stabilized with different percentages or types of binders in the field mixing, the actual strength of the stabilized mixtures under field circumstances is lower than that in laboratory prepared mixtures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2023. article id 5446332
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Research subject
Soil Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-93990DOI: 10.1155/2023/5446332ISI: 000965277600002Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85152794483OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-93990DiVA, id: diva2:1709884
Projects
Sustainable treatment of coastal deposited sulfde soils (STASIS)
Note

Validerad;2023;Nivå 2;2023-04-14 (hanlid);

Funder: Interreg Botnia-Atlantica program

Available from: 2022-11-10 Created: 2022-11-10 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Mechanical properties of excavated sulfur rich soil stabilized with cement - A laboratory and field experiment
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Mechanical properties of excavated sulfur rich soil stabilized with cement - A laboratory and field experiment
2023 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Sulfide soils are silty soils, often found in saturated conditions, under the groundwater level. Characteristics of these soils, including particle size distribution and consistency limits along with chemical composition and environmental properties, cause excavation to be necessary for construction purposes. The excavated sulfide soil usually is transported and deposited in landfills. These soils are either deposited in saturated conditions or chemical buffers are added to the soil to prevent acidification. Special conditions of these landfills complicate the disposal procedure and the landfill maintenance which makes those financially expensive. Reusing sulfide soil in construction is a solution to reduce the expenses related to the management of sulfide soils. Since the mechanical properties of these soils are not suitable for construction purposes, the first step is to improve soil characteristics to the level that fulfills the needs of construction applications. One solution to improve the mechanical properties of the soil is adding a binder to the soil.

The main focus of the research was to improve the mechanical properties of soil. The research activities were divided into two parts. The first part was conducted in a laboratory environment to develop mixtures, while the second focused on transferring the results to field conditions. The laboratory tests included mixing soil and binder i.e., cement was added to the soil at different percentages to evaluate the soil improvement. An unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test was conducted on the stabilized sample to evaluate the efficiency of the stabilization. The resultsof UCS for the stabilized samples were compared. Since the soil contains a high amount of water, the traditional sample preparation was not suitable. Therefore, an alternative method was developed and evaluated. Moreover, the effect of curing time on the strength and consistency limit of stabilized samples was evaluated. At last, the effect of different variables, including porosity, binder content and initial water content, on the UCS of soil was investigated to identify potential correlation between UCS and different soil variables.

The results of the tests showed that adding a binder, regardless of the type of sulfide soil, positively affects the UCS of prepared samples and increasing the curing time increased the UCS of the samples. At higher cement content, the effect of curing time was more significant. Also, it was shown that at higher water content, the effect of binder is lower in comparison with the same soil at lower water content. By lowering the water content, the strength of stabilized soil reaches a maximum and drying further the soil, below the optimum water content, led to strength reduction. A correlation between UCS of sample and porosity/binder ratio was employed to predict the strength behavior of stabilized soil based on variables such as porosity, initial water content and binder dosage.

In order to evaluate if laboratory results can be applied to geotechnical applications, the second part of this research included a field mixing experiment for a large-scale mixture of soil and cement. The effect of the mixing procedure with common equipment on the homogeneity of industrial-size mixture was investigated. A sampling strategy for collecting representative samples of mixture was selected and assessed. the number of mixing steps and the effect of binder dosage on the uniformity of samples were studied. Results of UCS of samples prepared from field and laboratory mixture were compared and evaluated. A field evaluation was conducted to determine the quality of the mixture and how many mixing steps are required to reduce variability between samples. Two different percentages of binder were added to the 5 Tons of soil. The UCS test samples were prepared from the soil-cement mixture in the same way as they were prepared in the laboratory and cured for a specific time. The UCS test was conducted on cured samples. The test results were compared to evaluate the mixture homogeneity in the field.

The results showed that homogeneous mixtures can be obtained in the field with the available equipment. Assessing the sampling strategy showed that increasing the sampling sections from 5 to 12 and preparing single UCS sample from the collected soil provides representative samples from the soil mixture pile. Additionally, it was shown that by increasing mixing steps from 2 to 3, it was possible to eliminate samples with notable lower strength than average UCS. A greater number of mixing steps improves homogeneity while reducing the average UCS. It was found that mixing soil and binder in the laboratory improves strength better than mixing them in the field. When applying laboratory results to field design, this point must be taken into account.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2023
Series
Licentiate thesis / Luleå University of Technology, ISSN 1402-1757
Keywords
Sulfur-rich soil, Mixing, Sampling, Unconfined compressive strength, stabilization, Porosity, Water content, Consistency limits
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Research subject
Soil Mechanics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-93992 (URN)978-91-8048-212-7 (ISBN)978-91-8048-213-4 (ISBN)
Presentation
2023-01-20, E652, Luleå tekniska universitet, Luleå, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-11-10 Created: 2022-11-10 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved
2. Management of Excavated Sulfide soils: Enhancing Mechanical Stability and Maintaining Moisture Content
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Management of Excavated Sulfide soils: Enhancing Mechanical Stability and Maintaining Moisture Content
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Most scientific literature on sulfide-rich soils address the environmental hazard caused by the oxidation of Potential Acid Sulfate Soil (PASS) in its unoxidized form to Acid Sulfate Soil (ASS) when exposed to oxygen. Sulfide-rich soils pose also significant geotechnical challenges due to high water content and organic content, fine particles, lack of consolidation and acid-generating potential. Excavation and disposal are often necessary for infrastructure projects in e.g. Sweden and Finland. This thesis investigates approaches managing excavated sulfide soils by enhancing their mechanical properties for geotechnical applications and optimizing water content in the soil to mitigate oxidation risks.  

The research comprises three interrelated components. The first focuses on field experiments evaluating the efficiency of in-situ mixing techniques in improving the uniformity and mechanical stability of sulfide soil-binder mixtures. Results indicate that multi-stage mixing substantially enhanced soil-binder homogeneity and strength of the stabilized soil. Mechanical stability of laboratory prepared samples consistently outperformed those mixed in the field. A predictive model was developed to explain the observed trends, highlighting the critical roles of binder dosage, porosity, and water content in achieving stabilization.  

The second component examines the stabilization of acid sulfate soils using Portland cement and Multicem binders. Portland cement was more effective in enhancing mechanical properties due to its rapid increase in alkalinity, particularly in highly acidic soils. Multicem, while effective under moderately acidic conditions, was less successful in environments with high acidity. The study emphasized the importance of understanding the interactions between binder type, soil composition, and environmental factors.   

The final part investigates the role of multi-layer soil cover systems in mine and sulfide soil landfill designs in controlling moisture dynamics. Sulfide soil landfills were analyzed using numerical modeling validated through field instrumentation. The findings demonstrated that cover material properties, thickness, and the inclusion of features like capillary breaks are significant in maintaining moisture and minimizing environmental risks by oxidation. These insights were also applies to mine covers.  

This thesis provides a framework for a more sustainable management of sulfiderich soils by integrating findings from field experiments, laboratory, and numerical modeling. This study aims to contribute to the development of practical strategies to reduce society’s reliance on landfills for managing excavated sulfide soils, promoting geotechnical applications while mitigating environmental impacts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå tekniska universitet, 2025
Series
Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → …, ISSN 1402-1544
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Research subject
Soil Mechanics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-111009 (URN)978-91-8048-718-4 (ISBN)978-91-8048-719-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-03-11, E632, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2024-12-10 Created: 2024-12-09 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2211 kB)232 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2211 kBChecksum SHA-512
6e603fb0e61c372827cd57d1150de923c2ddec2545d9b3839a087c8c3d264c0ad41d74f53785a5f68ee2f205463424325f1a99157f41d2b595c9ab4dfe23169e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ziagharib, AlalehMaurice, ChristianJia, QiLaue, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ziagharib, AlalehMaurice, ChristianJia, QiLaue, Jan
By organisation
Mining and Geotechnical Engineering
In the same journal
Advances in Civil Engineering / Hindawi
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 232 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 324 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf