Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Mechanical properties of excavated sulfur rich soil stabilized with cement - A laboratory and field experiment
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Mining and Geotechnical Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9688-9614
2023 (English)Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Sulfide soils are silty soils, often found in saturated conditions, under the groundwater level. Characteristics of these soils, including particle size distribution and consistency limits along with chemical composition and environmental properties, cause excavation to be necessary for construction purposes. The excavated sulfide soil usually is transported and deposited in landfills. These soils are either deposited in saturated conditions or chemical buffers are added to the soil to prevent acidification. Special conditions of these landfills complicate the disposal procedure and the landfill maintenance which makes those financially expensive. Reusing sulfide soil in construction is a solution to reduce the expenses related to the management of sulfide soils. Since the mechanical properties of these soils are not suitable for construction purposes, the first step is to improve soil characteristics to the level that fulfills the needs of construction applications. One solution to improve the mechanical properties of the soil is adding a binder to the soil.

The main focus of the research was to improve the mechanical properties of soil. The research activities were divided into two parts. The first part was conducted in a laboratory environment to develop mixtures, while the second focused on transferring the results to field conditions. The laboratory tests included mixing soil and binder i.e., cement was added to the soil at different percentages to evaluate the soil improvement. An unconfined compressive strength (UCS) test was conducted on the stabilized sample to evaluate the efficiency of the stabilization. The resultsof UCS for the stabilized samples were compared. Since the soil contains a high amount of water, the traditional sample preparation was not suitable. Therefore, an alternative method was developed and evaluated. Moreover, the effect of curing time on the strength and consistency limit of stabilized samples was evaluated. At last, the effect of different variables, including porosity, binder content and initial water content, on the UCS of soil was investigated to identify potential correlation between UCS and different soil variables.

The results of the tests showed that adding a binder, regardless of the type of sulfide soil, positively affects the UCS of prepared samples and increasing the curing time increased the UCS of the samples. At higher cement content, the effect of curing time was more significant. Also, it was shown that at higher water content, the effect of binder is lower in comparison with the same soil at lower water content. By lowering the water content, the strength of stabilized soil reaches a maximum and drying further the soil, below the optimum water content, led to strength reduction. A correlation between UCS of sample and porosity/binder ratio was employed to predict the strength behavior of stabilized soil based on variables such as porosity, initial water content and binder dosage.

In order to evaluate if laboratory results can be applied to geotechnical applications, the second part of this research included a field mixing experiment for a large-scale mixture of soil and cement. The effect of the mixing procedure with common equipment on the homogeneity of industrial-size mixture was investigated. A sampling strategy for collecting representative samples of mixture was selected and assessed. the number of mixing steps and the effect of binder dosage on the uniformity of samples were studied. Results of UCS of samples prepared from field and laboratory mixture were compared and evaluated. A field evaluation was conducted to determine the quality of the mixture and how many mixing steps are required to reduce variability between samples. Two different percentages of binder were added to the 5 Tons of soil. The UCS test samples were prepared from the soil-cement mixture in the same way as they were prepared in the laboratory and cured for a specific time. The UCS test was conducted on cured samples. The test results were compared to evaluate the mixture homogeneity in the field.

The results showed that homogeneous mixtures can be obtained in the field with the available equipment. Assessing the sampling strategy showed that increasing the sampling sections from 5 to 12 and preparing single UCS sample from the collected soil provides representative samples from the soil mixture pile. Additionally, it was shown that by increasing mixing steps from 2 to 3, it was possible to eliminate samples with notable lower strength than average UCS. A greater number of mixing steps improves homogeneity while reducing the average UCS. It was found that mixing soil and binder in the laboratory improves strength better than mixing them in the field. When applying laboratory results to field design, this point must be taken into account.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2023.
Series
Licentiate thesis / Luleå University of Technology, ISSN 1402-1757
Keywords [en]
Sulfur-rich soil, Mixing, Sampling, Unconfined compressive strength, stabilization, Porosity, Water content, Consistency limits
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Research subject
Soil Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-93992ISBN: 978-91-8048-212-7 (print)ISBN: 978-91-8048-213-4 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-93992DiVA, id: diva2:1709888
Presentation
2023-01-20, E652, Luleå tekniska universitet, Luleå, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-11-10 Created: 2022-11-10 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Performance of Excavated Sulfur-Rich Soil Stabilized with Binder: A Field Study of Mixing Efficiency
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Performance of Excavated Sulfur-Rich Soil Stabilized with Binder: A Field Study of Mixing Efficiency
Show others...
2023 (English)In: Advances in Civil Engineering / Hindawi, ISSN 1687-8086, E-ISSN 1687-8094, article id 5446332Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this study, a mixing procedure of sulfur-rich soil and cement-based binder to enhance the soil’s unconfined compressive strength (UCS) was tested in field conditions for geotechnical applications. The focus was to evaluate uniformity of industrial size soil-binder mixture, blended by existing method. This paper outlined sampling strategy and the number of samples needed for a valid uniformity evaluation. Moreover, this study emphasized the difference between field mixing and laboratory mixture preparation by comparing UCS of stabilized soil samples in the field and UCS of corresponding samples mixed and prepared in the laboratory environment. In the field, soil and cement were blended in two to four stages with 5% and 7% cement—the percentages being based on the soil’s dry weight under field conditions. Samples were taken from the field mixtures after each stage. Since the number of samples needed to be representative of mixture characteristics for large-scale mixing is not standardized, this field experiment included two phases. The first phase was dedicated to finding a sampling strategy for a large soil pile along with measuring UCS of collected samples. In the second phase, sample collection was conducted based on the results of sampling strategy from the first phase. In the laboratory, samples with percentages of binder similar to the amount of binder in the field were also prepared. Both field and laboratory samples were prepared using the tapping method in the laboratory for UCS test. Samples were cured under similar conditions for 28 days. The results showed that the uniformity of mixture improved after each additional mixing stage. In addition, while spots with low UCS were observed in the second mixing step, these spots were eliminated in the third mixing step, and results of the UCS tests were comparatively uniform. Moreover, comparison of the samples revealed that the UCS of the laboratory mixture is higher than that of the field mixture. This showed that even though the UCS is a good standard for comparing the strength of different soils stabilized with different percentages or types of binders in the field mixing, the actual strength of the stabilized mixtures under field circumstances is lower than that in laboratory prepared mixtures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2023
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Research subject
Soil Mechanics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-93990 (URN)10.1155/2023/5446332 (DOI)000965277600002 ()2-s2.0-85152794483 (Scopus ID)
Projects
Sustainable treatment of coastal deposited sulfde soils (STASIS)
Note

Validerad;2023;Nivå 2;2023-04-14 (hanlid);

Funder: Interreg Botnia-Atlantica program

Available from: 2022-11-10 Created: 2022-11-10 Last updated: 2025-10-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3187 kB)476 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3187 kBChecksum SHA-512
1cd1ec76b7222a1312ce0678229919403e521778de2822fbcb89179a6786befe1e52456d4e16472521907073253e8bd29d74d6372c98f3bd562a704ad5fe556f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Ziagharib, Alaleh

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ziagharib, Alaleh
By organisation
Mining and Geotechnical Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 477 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 501 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf