5678910118 of 15
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Uranium sources and mobility at an iron ore mine site in Northern Sweden: A geochemical, mineralogical and isotopic investigation
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Geosciences and Environmental Engineering.ORCID iD: 0009-0005-2596-0758
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The contamination of aquatic environments by uranium (U) is a global concern due to its chemical toxicity and radioactivity, both of which pose significant health risks. Although U occurs naturally in the earth’s crust and is commonly present at low concentrations in natural waters, elevated levels in the environment can result from both natural and human-induced sources. While previous research has focused primarily on U release from U mining and processing sites, less attention has been given to U behavior at non-U mining sites such as iron ore mines, where U may still be present as a trace element. Under certain conditions, U can become mobilized posing a contamination risk to recipient rivers and lakes downstream. This study investigated U sources and mobility at the LKAB iron ore mine in Svappavaara, Northern Sweden, where U concentrations exceeding the Swedish annual average guideline value of 0.17 µg/L have been detected in a river receiving excess process water from the mine site. 

The results show that the iron ore fed into the processing plant is not a significant contributor to U in the process water circulating in the mine’s water management system. This is due to the iron ore’s low U content and the occurrence of U in thorite, a mineral that remains stable under the alkaline pH conditions prevailing in the processing plant. However, the ore also contains gypsum and anhydrite which dissolve after being liberated during grinding releasing calcium (Ca) and sulphate (SO42-). The presence of Ca promotes the formation of ternary calcium-uranyl-carbonate complexes, which increase U solubility and reduce its tendency to adsorb onto mineral surfaces. As a result, U mobility is enhanced within the water management system and toward the recipient river downstream. 

Mine water pumped from Leveäniemi open pit was identified as the primary source of U at the mine site. This U originates from both groundwater infiltration into the open pit and weathering of U-bearing minerals in the open pit walls. Minewall weathering stations revealed that among the different rock types present in the open pit, pegmatite had the highest U leaching rates per unit area. However, trachyandesite, the dominant rock type in both the hanging and footwall, exhibited lower U leaching rates but likely contributes more U overall due to its abundance. Groundwater entering the open pit through fractures and the drainage pipes was also identified as a key U source influencing U concentration in the mine water. However, tracing U back to specific rock sources is challenging due to evolving groundwater flow paths as mining progresses and limited access to rocks along these flow paths. As a result, elemental and isotopic tracers are needed to better understand U release from bedrock into circulating groundwater. To support this, further investigation into U release from pegmatite and trachyandesite rock under varying geochemical conditions was carried out. 

Acidic environments significantly enhanced U release, particularly from uraninite compared to more refractory minerals such as fergusonite, and thorite. Under neutral pH conditions, mineral dissolution was limited, and U was primarily mobilized through surface desorption and complexation with dissolved ligands. Carbonate was the most effective ligand in promoting U mobility under these conditions. Elemental correlations suggested that trace elements such as Pb, Th, Nb, and Y could serve as indicators of pegmatite-derived U, as they are commonly associated with the primary U-bearing minerals in pegmatite. In contrast, U leached from trachyandesite showed similar leaching behavior to elements typically found in silicate minerals such as Fe, Al, Si, Mg, and Mn. These elements are not effective tracers for trachyandesite-derived U because they are ubiquitous in silicate minerals, some of which may dissolve under the same geochemical conditions, making it difficult to attribute their presence to U-bearing phases. U isotope analyses added a valuable dimension to the study revealing differences in source behavior not captured by elemental concentrations alone. While δ238U overlapped between the rock types, 234U/238U activity ratios varied distinctly. The lack of overlap in 234U/238U activity ratios between pegmatite and trachyandesite leachates under neutral pH conditions both in NaHCO3 and groundwater solutions suggests that these ratios are more suitable than δ238U for distinguishing between U rock sources in groundwater at the mine site.

These findings highlight the importance of understanding both the sources and geochemical controls on U mobility in non-U mining environments. This knowledge is essential for implementing effective source-specific remediation strategies and improving water management practices to minimize U transport to downstream ecosystems. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Luleå: Luleå University of Technology, 2025.
Series
Doctoral thesis / Luleå University of Technology 1 jan 1997 → …, ISSN 1402-1544
Keywords [en]
uranium mobility, sources, groundwater, iron ore mining, leaching, isotopic tracers
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Applied Geochemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-112108ISBN: 978-91-8048-801-3 (print)ISBN: 978-91-8048-802-0 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-112108DiVA, id: diva2:1947055
Public defence
2025-05-27, E632, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-03-25 Created: 2025-03-24 Last updated: 2025-03-25Bibliographically approved
List of papers
1. Uranium dynamics at an iron ore mine site in Northern Sweden: Sources and mobility along the mine value chain
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Uranium dynamics at an iron ore mine site in Northern Sweden: Sources and mobility along the mine value chain
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, ISSN 0169-7722, E-ISSN 1873-6009, Vol. 270, article id 104530Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Uranium (U) release from mining has been typically associated with former U mine sites, but trace U levels in iron or base metal ores can also lead to U mobilization into ground and surface water posing potential risks due to U's chemical toxicity and radioactivity. This study investigates U sources and mobility at an iron ore mine site in Northern Sweden, where U concentrations (median 1.8 μg/l) exceeding the Swedish annual guideline value of 0.17 μg/l have been detected in a river receiving excess process water from the mine site. Drill core samples were characterized to identify the minerals hosting U in the iron ore and sequential extraction tests were conducted on solid samples from the processing plant to assess U mobility potential. Results indicate that, given its low U content, iron ore is not a significant source of the elevated U levels detected in the process water. Thorite, the main U-bearing mineral remains stable under the neutral to alkaline pH conditions in the processing plant. U speciation calculations on process water monitoring data, performed in PHREEQC with the PRODATA thermodynamic database, revealed dominant calcium uranyl carbonate complexes, specifically Ca2UO2(CO3)3 and CaUO2(CO3)32−. Mine water from Leveäniemi and Gruvberget open pits, particularly Leveäniemi, was identified as the main source of U to the process water in the recirculation system. The U in mine water originates from groundwater infiltration into the open pits and leaching of U from the open pit wall rocks. Further investigation of these sources and U's geochemical behavior in mine water before it mixes with process water in the processing plant is crucial for understanding the processes driving elevated downstream U concentrations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025
Keywords
Uranium, Sources, Mobility, iron ore, Process water, Thorite, Speciation
National Category
Geochemistry Mineral and Mine Engineering
Research subject
Applied Geochemistry; Ore Geology; Centre - Centre for Advanced Mining & Metallurgy (CAMM)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-111884 (URN)10.1016/j.jconhyd.2025.104530 (DOI)2-s2.0-85219546977 (Scopus ID)
Note

Validerad;2025;Nivå 2;2025-03-06 (u2);

Full text: CC BY license;

Funder: Luossavara Kiirunavaara AB (LKAB);

Available from: 2025-03-06 Created: 2025-03-06 Last updated: 2025-03-25Bibliographically approved
2. Identifying key uranium sources in mine water: open pit wall rock leaching and groundwater contributions in Leveäniemi open pit
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Identifying key uranium sources in mine water: open pit wall rock leaching and groundwater contributions in Leveäniemi open pit
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, ISSN 0375-6742, E-ISSN 1879-1689, Vol. 275, article id 107773Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Uranium (U) release from mining is an environmental concern due to U's chemical toxicity and radioactivity. In Sweden, U is classified as a river basin-specific pollutant (RBSP), emphasizing the need to minimize its release from mining activities. This study aims to trace the sources of U contributing to elevated concentrations in mine water from Leveäniemi open pit, Northern Sweden, to inform point-source prevention measures to mitigate U release. The study investigates U leaching rates from key rock types forming the open pit walls and evaluates groundwater entering the open pit through drainage pipes and fractures as a potential source of U. Minewall weathering stations showed higher U leaching rates from pegmatites compared to other rock types. The pegmatite station where uraninite was the predominant mineral had a leaching rate averaging 1800 μg/m2/wk, compared to 430 μg/m2/wk at the station where pyrochlore was the predominant U mineral and uraninite occurred as inclusions in pyrochlore. However, pegmatites cover a small area of the exposed surface in the open pit compared to trachyandesite, which leached at a lower average rate of 30 μg/m2/wk. Groundwater entering the open pit through fractures and drainage pipes was also identified as a significant source of U in the mine water, further influencing mine water U concentrations. Careful handling of pegmatite-containing waste rock is essential to prevent increased U leaching in both the open pit and waste rock dumps. This study highlights the importance of identifying rocks with high U release potential before exposure during mining. Additionally, understanding the distribution of these high U-release rock types along groundwater flow paths can also help to predict groundwater U concentrations and inform site-specific management strategies to mitigate U contamination in downstream recipients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025
Keywords
Uraninite, Rock leaching, Groundwater, Pegmatite, Trachyandesite, Minewall station
National Category
Palaeontology and Palaeoecology Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Applied Geochemistry; Ore Geology; Centre - Centre for Advanced Mining & Metallurgy (CAMM)
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-112103 (URN)10.1016/j.gexplo.2025.107773 (DOI)
Note

Validerad;2025;Nivå 2;2025-04-15 (u4);

Funder: LKAB;

Fulltext license: CC BY;

This article has previously appeared as a manuscript in a thesis.

Available from: 2025-03-24 Created: 2025-03-24 Last updated: 2025-04-15Bibliographically approved
3. Understanding uranium release mechanisms by laboratory rock leaching part 1: elemental and mineralogical analysis
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Understanding uranium release mechanisms by laboratory rock leaching part 1: elemental and mineralogical analysis
Show others...
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Applied Geochemistry
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-112104 (URN)
Available from: 2025-03-24 Created: 2025-03-24 Last updated: 2025-03-25
4. Understanding Uranium Release Mechanisms by Laboratory Rock Leaching Part 2: Isotopic analysis
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Understanding Uranium Release Mechanisms by Laboratory Rock Leaching Part 2: Isotopic analysis
Show others...
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
National Category
Environmental Sciences Geochemistry
Research subject
Applied Geochemistry
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-112105 (URN)
Available from: 2025-03-24 Created: 2025-03-24 Last updated: 2025-03-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Authority records

Dzimbanhete, Vimbainashe L.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dzimbanhete, Vimbainashe L.
By organisation
Geosciences and Environmental Engineering
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 572 hits
5678910118 of 15
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf