CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Probing Chain-of-Thought (ProCoT): Stimulating critical thinking and writing of students through engagement with large language models
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Embedded Internet Systems Lab.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5582-2031
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Signals and Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1343-1742
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Embedded Internet Systems Lab.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering, Embedded Internet Systems Lab.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology, E-ISSN 2687-3788, Vol. 7, no 4Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

We introduce a novel writing method called Probing Chain-of-Thought, which potentially prevents students from cheating using a large language model while enhancing their critical thinking. large language models have disrupted education and many other fields. For fear of students cheating, many educationists have resorted to banning their use. We conduct studies in two different courses with 65 students using qualitative research design primarily (i.e. phenomenological) and quantitative methods. The students in each course were asked to prompt a large language model of their choice with one question from a set of four (random) questions and required to affirm or refute statements in the large language model output by using peer-reviewed references as evidence. In addition, the rubric for assessing the students writing included 5 more criteria: focus, logic, content, style and correctness. The average success rate of the writing of students based on the criteria for the two cases is 79.49% (±12.82%). The results of the rubric assessment show two things: (1) Probing Chain-of-Thought stimulates critical thinking and writing of students through engagement with large language models when we compare the large language models-only output to Probing Chain-of-Thought output and (2) Probing Chain-of-Thought may prevent cheating because of clear limitations in the concerned large language models when we compare students’ Probing Chain-of-Thought output to large language models’ Probing Chain-of-Thought output. In quantitative analysis, we also discover that most students prefer to give answers in fewer words than large language models, which are typically verbose. The average word counts for students in the first course, ChatGPT 3.5, and Phind (v8) are 208, 391 and 383, respectively, while it is 405, 356, and 315 for students, ChatGPT 3.5, and BingAI, respectively, in the second course, where we enforced a minimum word-count of 300 for the students. We provide access to the outputs for possible assessments (available after review).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Şahin Danişman , 2025. Vol. 7, no 4
Keywords [en]
ChatGPT, cheating, education, pedagogy, ProCoT, LLM
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Machine Learning
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-115792DOI: 10.33902/jpsp.202536789OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-115792DiVA, id: diva2:2021179
Funder
Luleå University of Technology
Note

Full text license: CC BY;

Available from: 2025-12-12 Created: 2025-12-12 Last updated: 2025-12-12

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(707 kB)36 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 707 kBChecksum SHA-512
72728f2b6dc999718854beaa76274fa7cde427431d0770819ad0ba645c59f1228eaaec5741905fb91098d1ec4a23939e48f72785765df475159eee65b312e9ba
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Adewumi, TosinAlkhaled, LamaBarney, Elisa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Adewumi, TosinAlkhaled, LamaBuck, ClaudiaSerrano Hernández, SergioBrilioth, SagaKekung, MkpeRagimov, YelvinBarney, Elisa
By organisation
Embedded Internet Systems LabSignals and Systems
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 623 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf