3233343536373835 of 50
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk-based design of grass swales: assessing the impact of soil hydraulic conductivity on swale overflow mitigation
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4982-6060
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), N-7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9938-8217
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Architecture and Water.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1725-6478
2025 (English)In: Blue-Green Systems, E-ISSN 2617-4782, Vol. 7, no 2, p. 468-489Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To assess the reliability of green stormwater infrastructure (GSI), including grass swales, it is required to characterize the frequency of system failures. This involves identifying the conditions when the system operates in failure mode, potentially causing downstream flooding. The study utilized three 23-year meteorological time series from three Swedish locations, characterized by frontal, convective, or orographic rainfall events. These time series served as inputs for the simulation of runoff flows using the SWMM model, representing the physical characteristics of a grass swale (GS) located in Luleå, Sweden. Results showed a trend of reduced overflow occurrences and flood risks at higher ksat values of 25 and 31 mm/h. Exceedance curves indicated that ksat values of 2 or 4 mm/h resulted in the swale operating in failure mode 100% of the time. A minimum ksat of 31 mm/h was required to achieve acceptable operation for more than 50% of the time in Gothenburg and Luleå. Östersund was the only location where the studied GS did not operate in failure mode under a high ksat of 31 mm/h. Local climate – especially rainfall distribution and frequency – sets performance thresholds and underscores the need to integrate technical performance with flood risk management in GSI design.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IWA Publishing, 2025. Vol. 7, no 2, p. 468-489
Keywords [en]
failure operation, grass swales, overflow events, risk-based swale design, saturated hydraulic conductivity, stormwater management
National Category
Water Engineering
Research subject
Urban Water Engineering; Centre - Centre for Stormwater Management (DRIZZLE)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-115896DOI: 10.2166/bgs.2025.010ISI: 001651704000001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-115896DiVA, id: diva2:2025947
Funder
Vinnova, 2022-03092
Note

Full text license: CC BY

Available from: 2026-01-08 Created: 2026-01-08 Last updated: 2026-01-08

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1006 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1006 kBChecksum SHA-512
ef7b925b2b23a5bd8fd54b8be6d4b4ad39478f2b4f4fe74f5de0477e3f03f0a3721dc1744969bf955338564ef0216eafb9be9ae13096873bcfcce9a52f1224ea
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Mantilla, IvanMarsalek, JiriViklander, Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mantilla, IvanMarsalek, JiriViklander, Maria
By organisation
Architecture and Water
Water Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
3233343536373835 of 50
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf